Jump to content

Internet Fragmentation: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Vivian (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Internet Fragmentation''' is the idea that the Internet may be in danger of splitting into a series of cyberspace segments, thus endangering its connectivity.<ref name="aah">[https://www.weforum.org/reports/internet-fragmentation-an-overview/ Internet Fragmentation: An Overview], WEForum.org. Published 2016 January 23. Retrieved 2016 April 18.</ref>
'''Internet Fragmentation''' is the idea that the Internet may be in danger of splitting into a series of cyberspace segments, thus endangering its connectivity.<ref name="aah">[https://www.weforum.org/reports/internet-fragmentation-an-overview/ Internet Fragmentation: An Overview], WEForum.org. Published 2016 January 23. Retrieved 2016 April 18.</ref>
==History==
During the 2015 World Economic Forum, Internet fragmentation was noted as one of the primary concerns facing the future of the internet due to trends in technological developments, government policies, and commercial practices. Nonetheless, there needed to be a more widespread consensus regarding its nature or scope.<ref name="wef">[http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_FII_Internet_Fragmentation_An_Overview_2016.pdf Internet Fragmentation], WEForum.org. Published January 2016. Retrieved April 18, 2016.</ref>


During the 2015 [[World Economic Forum]], Internet fragmentation was noted as one of the primary concerns facing the future of the internet, due to trends in technological developments, government policies, and commercial practices. Nonetheless, there was no widespread consensus as to its nature or scope.<ref name="wef">[http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_FII_Internet_Fragmentation_An_Overview_2016.pdf Internet Fragmentation], WEForum.org. Published 2016 January. Retrieved 2016 April 18.</ref>
The launch of the World Economic Forum's multi-year Future of the Internet <ref>[https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCP_Future_of_the_Internet_pager.pdf Future of the Interne] </ref> (FII) considers Internet fragmentation as one of the primary topics warranting exploration, in the context of the FII's Governance on the Internet project.<ref name="wef"></ref>


The launch of the World Economic Forum's multi-year [[Future of the Internet Initiative]] (FII) considers Internet fragmentation as one of the primary topics warranting exploration, in the context of the FII's Governance on the Internet project.<ref name="wef"></ref>
In the early 2020s, the issue of Internet fragmentation surfaced again, this time primarily with a focus on managing jurisdiction and legislative issues as governments try to regulate [[Data Privacy]], big tech's reach, CSAM, [[cybercrime]], and [[DNS Abuse]] without understanding the technical aspects of [[Internet Governance]] or trying to harmonize their initiatives first.<ref>[https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/z-IIZtLrUY1_Gq_l7PyRZ8pna5_9pAm_Ek6lE0Hq_3WKfs6zJXE4ativBL7S7304nXsI8_4LsiIQqKuD.PO3kA7dCG84ilnVs?continueMode=true&_x_zm_rtaid=-iU9tCESSpK2CHF40LSYag.1643736262198.efe2ce77561874584c81f3a6d46427b4&_x_zm_rhtaid=284 Patrik Faltstrom and Chris Mondini, Fragmentation of the Internet? – Technical and political aspects, Nordic Forum January 2022]</ref>


==Nature of Fragmentation==
Working definitions are proposed for three forms of fragmentation:<ref name="wef"></ref>
Working definitions are proposed for three forms of fragmentation:<ref name="wef"></ref>


Line 13: Line 16:
In each case, fragmentation may vary greatly according to a number of dimensions or attributes. Four primary ones include:<ref name="wef"></ref>
In each case, fragmentation may vary greatly according to a number of dimensions or attributes. Four primary ones include:<ref name="wef"></ref>


* '''Occurrence:'''' Whether a type of fragmentation exists or is merely a potential
* '''Occurrence:''' Whether a type of fragmentation exists or is merely a potential
* '''Intentionality:''' Whether fragmentation is the result of deliberate action or an unintended consequence
* '''Intentionality:''' Whether fragmentation is the result of deliberate action or an unintended consequence
* '''Impact:''' Whether fragmentation is deep, structural and configurative of large swaths of activity or even the Internet as a whole, or rather more shallow, malleable and applicable to a narrowly bounded set of processes, transactions and actors
* '''Impact:''' Whether fragmentation is deep, structural and configurative of large swaths of activity or even the Internet as a whole, or rather more shallow, malleable and applicable to a narrowly bounded set of processes, transactions and actors
Line 20: Line 23:
==Types of Fragmentation==
==Types of Fragmentation==
===Technical Fragmentation===
===Technical Fragmentation===
When the Internet concept was first articulated, a guiding vision was that
Internet addressing, interconnection, naming, and security are primary issue areas leading to technical fragmentation. Within these categories, 12 kinds of fragmentation are identified:<ref name="wef"></ref>
every device on the Internet should be able to exchange packets with any
 
other device. Universal connectivity was assumed to be a primary benefit. But
# Network Address Translation
there are a variety of ways in which the original concept has been eroded
# IPv4 and IPv6 incompatibility and the dual-stack requirement
through a complex evolutionary process that has unfolded slowly but is
# Routing corruption
gathering pockets of steam in the contemporary era.
# Firewall protections
Four issue-areas are reviewed, including Internet addressing, interconnection,
# Virtual private network isolation and blocking
naming and security. Within these categories, 12 kinds of fragmentation of
# TOR "onion space" and the "dark web"
varying degrees of significance are identified:
# Internationalized Domain Name technical errors
1. Network Address Translation
# Blocking of new gTLDs
2. IPv4 and IPv6 incompatibility and the dual-stack requirement
# Private name servers and the split-horizon DNS
3. Routing corruption
# Segmented Wi-Fi services in hotels, restaurants, etc.
4. Firewall protections
# Possibility of significant alternate DNS roots
5. Virtual private network isolation and blocking
# Certificate authorities producing false certificates
5
6. TOR “onion space” and the “dark web”
7. Internationalized Domain Name technical errors
8. Blocking of new gTLDs
9. Private name servers and the split-horizon DNS
10. Segmented Wi-Fi services in hotels, restaurants, etc.
11. Possibility of significant alternate DNS roots
12. Certificate authorities producing false certificates


===Governmental Fragmentation===
===Governmental Fragmentation===
The most common imagery of “governmental fragmentation” is of the global
Barrier between nations or national segmentation that could create barriers in the way the internet functions. Six primary issues include content and censorship; e-commerce
public Internet being divided into digitally bordered “national Internets”.
and trade; national security; privacy and data protection; data localization; and fragmentation as an overarching national strategy.<ref name="wef"></ref>
Movement in the direction of national segmentation could entail, inter alia,
 
establishing barriers that impede Internet technical functions, or block the flow
Within these categories, 10 kinds of fragmentation are identified:<ref name="wef"></ref>
of information and e-commerce over the infrastructure. Pressure and trends in
# Filtering and blocking websites, social networks or other resources offering undesired contents
this direction do exist, as do counter-pressures.
# Attacks on information resources offering undesired contents
Six issue-areas are reviewed, including: content and censorship; e-commerce
# Digital protectionism blocking users' access to and use of key platforms and tools for electronic commerce
and trade; national security; privacy and data protection; data localization; and
# Centralizing and terminating international interconnection
fragmentation as an overarching national strategy. Within these categories,
# Attacks on national networks and key assets
10 kinds of fragmentation of varying degrees of significance are identified:
# Local data processing and/or retention requirements
1. Filtering and blocking websites, social networks or other resources offering
# Architectural or routing changes to keep data flows within a territory
undesired contents
# Prohibitions on the transborder movement of certain categories of data
2. Attacks on information resources offering undesired contents
# Strategies to construct “national Internet segments” or "cybersovereignty"
3. Digital protectionism blocking users’ access to and use of key platforms
# International frameworks intended to legitimize restrictive practices
and tools for electronic commerce
4. Centralizing and terminating international interconnection
5. Attacks on national networks and key assets
6. Local data processing and/or retention requirements
7. Architectural or routing changes to keep data flows within a territory
8. Prohibitions on the transborder movement of certain categories of data
9. Strategies to construct “national Internet segments” or “cybersovereignty”
10.International frameworks intended to legitimize restrictive practices


===Commercial Fragmentation===
===Commercial Fragmentation===
A variety of critics have charged that certain commercial practices by
Fragmentation under commercial practices often pertain to the organization of specific markets and digital spaces. Five main issue areas include peering and standardization;
technology companies also may contribute to Internet fragmentation. The
network neutrality; walled gardens; geo-localization and geo-blocking; and infrastructure-related intellectual property protection.
nature of the alleged fragmentation often pertains to the organization of
 
specific markets and digital spaces and the experiences of users that choose
Within these categories, 10 kinds of fragmentation are identfied:<ref name="wef"></ref>
to participate in them, but sometimes it can impact the technical infrastructure
# Potential changes in interconnection agreements
and operational environments for everyone. Whether or not one considers
# Potential proprietary technical standards impeding interoperability in the IoT
commercial practices as meriting the same level of concern as, say, data
# Blocking, throttling, or other discriminatory departures from network neutrality
localization is of course a matter of perspective. Certainly there are significant
# Walled gardens
concerns from the perspectives of many Internet users, activists and
# Geo-blocking of content
competing providers in global markets. As such, the issues are on the table in
# Potential use of naming and numbering to block content for the purpose of intellectual property protection
6
the growing global dialogue about fragmentation, and they are therefore
discussed here.
Five issue-areas are reviewed, including: peering and standardization;
network neutrality; walled gardens; geo-localization and geo-blocking; and
infrastructure-related intellectual property protection. Within these categories,
10 kinds of fragmentation of varying degrees of significance are identified:
1. Potential changes in interconnection agreements
2. Potential proprietary technical standards impeding interoperability in the
IoT
3. Blocking, throttling, or other discriminatory departures from network
neutrality
4. Walled gardens
5. Geo-blocking of content
6. Potential use of naming and numbering to block content for the purpose of
intellectual property protection


==References==
==References==
[[Category:Concepts]]

Latest revision as of 15:20, 15 March 2023

Internet Fragmentation is the idea that the Internet may be in danger of splitting into a series of cyberspace segments, thus endangering its connectivity.[1]

History[edit | edit source]

During the 2015 World Economic Forum, Internet fragmentation was noted as one of the primary concerns facing the future of the internet due to trends in technological developments, government policies, and commercial practices. Nonetheless, there needed to be a more widespread consensus regarding its nature or scope.[2]

The launch of the World Economic Forum's multi-year Future of the Internet [3] (FII) considers Internet fragmentation as one of the primary topics warranting exploration, in the context of the FII's Governance on the Internet project.[2]

In the early 2020s, the issue of Internet fragmentation surfaced again, this time primarily with a focus on managing jurisdiction and legislative issues as governments try to regulate Data Privacy, big tech's reach, CSAM, cybercrime, and DNS Abuse without understanding the technical aspects of Internet Governance or trying to harmonize their initiatives first.[4]

Nature of Fragmentation[edit | edit source]

Working definitions are proposed for three forms of fragmentation:[2]

  • Technical Fragmentation: Conditions in the underlying infrastructure that impede the ability of systems to fully interoperate and exchange data packets and of the Internet to function consistently at all end points.
  • Governmental Fragmentation: Government policies and actions that constrain or prevent certain uses of the Internet to create, distribute, or access information resources.
  • Commercial Fragmentation: Business practices that constrain or prevent certain uses of the Internet to create, distribute, or access information resources.

In each case, fragmentation may vary greatly according to a number of dimensions or attributes. Four primary ones include:[2]

  • Occurrence: Whether a type of fragmentation exists or is merely a potential
  • Intentionality: Whether fragmentation is the result of deliberate action or an unintended consequence
  • Impact: Whether fragmentation is deep, structural and configurative of large swaths of activity or even the Internet as a whole, or rather more shallow, malleable and applicable to a narrowly bounded set of processes, transactions and actors
  • Character: Whether fragmentation is generally positive, negative, or neutral

Types of Fragmentation[edit | edit source]

Technical Fragmentation[edit | edit source]

Internet addressing, interconnection, naming, and security are primary issue areas leading to technical fragmentation. Within these categories, 12 kinds of fragmentation are identified:[2]

  1. Network Address Translation
  2. IPv4 and IPv6 incompatibility and the dual-stack requirement
  3. Routing corruption
  4. Firewall protections
  5. Virtual private network isolation and blocking
  6. TOR "onion space" and the "dark web"
  7. Internationalized Domain Name technical errors
  8. Blocking of new gTLDs
  9. Private name servers and the split-horizon DNS
  10. Segmented Wi-Fi services in hotels, restaurants, etc.
  11. Possibility of significant alternate DNS roots
  12. Certificate authorities producing false certificates

Governmental Fragmentation[edit | edit source]

Barrier between nations or national segmentation that could create barriers in the way the internet functions. Six primary issues include content and censorship; e-commerce and trade; national security; privacy and data protection; data localization; and fragmentation as an overarching national strategy.[2]

Within these categories, 10 kinds of fragmentation are identified:[2]

  1. Filtering and blocking websites, social networks or other resources offering undesired contents
  2. Attacks on information resources offering undesired contents
  3. Digital protectionism blocking users' access to and use of key platforms and tools for electronic commerce
  4. Centralizing and terminating international interconnection
  5. Attacks on national networks and key assets
  6. Local data processing and/or retention requirements
  7. Architectural or routing changes to keep data flows within a territory
  8. Prohibitions on the transborder movement of certain categories of data
  9. Strategies to construct “national Internet segments” or "cybersovereignty"
  10. International frameworks intended to legitimize restrictive practices

Commercial Fragmentation[edit | edit source]

Fragmentation under commercial practices often pertain to the organization of specific markets and digital spaces. Five main issue areas include peering and standardization; network neutrality; walled gardens; geo-localization and geo-blocking; and infrastructure-related intellectual property protection.

Within these categories, 10 kinds of fragmentation are identfied:[2]

  1. Potential changes in interconnection agreements
  2. Potential proprietary technical standards impeding interoperability in the IoT
  3. Blocking, throttling, or other discriminatory departures from network neutrality
  4. Walled gardens
  5. Geo-blocking of content
  6. Potential use of naming and numbering to block content for the purpose of intellectual property protection

References[edit | edit source]