Registry Services Evaluation Policy: Difference between revisions

(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)

Line 1:

'''RSEP''' is the ~~acronym for '''~~Registry Services ~~Evaluation Process~~'~~'' and represents the process which was created through~~ [[ICANN]]~~s consensus for policy development process~~.

The '''Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP)''' Process is a set of protocols designed to screen and approve proposals made by [[gTLD]] operators to add or modify registry services. To submit a request for the implementation of new Registry Services, all [[gTLD]]s must take into account RSEP's provisions. The RSEP is required by [[ICANN]] in order to make sure that no significant competition issues are raised.

==~~Short overview~~==

==History==

~~In order to submit a request for the implementation of new Registry Services, all~~ [[~~gTLD~~]]~~s must take into account the RSEP provisions~~.

RSEP was created through [[ICANN|ICANN's]] consensus for policy development process.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/prelim-competition-issues-en.htm ICANN.org]</ref>

~~The RSEP are being analyze by~~ [~~[ICANN]] to make sure that no significant~~ competition issues ~~are being raised~~ . ~~There are some preliminary reasonable determination stages which must be followed in order to determine whether the proposes Registry Services raise or not significant competition issues~~.

==~~RESP~~ request assessment==

On June 30, 2005, the GNSO released its [[PDP]] Final Report on the "Procedure for use by ICANN in considering requests for consent and related contractual amendments to allow changes in the architecture or operation of a gTLD registry."<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/registry-services/final-rpt-registry-approval-10july05.htm#1. RSEP Final Report, GNSO]</ref>

When determining whether the ~~RESP~~ request could raise significant competition issues, a review is necessary. The stages and steps followed are listed below:

# The General ~~Council~~ reviews the request for determining whether the ~~RESP~~ request could raise significant competition issues. The following factors are taken into consideration:

November 8, 2005, the ICANN Board directed that this procedure for considering requests for new Registry Services be guided by the provisions in the [[.net]] [[Registry Agreement]], per the GNSO's recommendation, which became the Registry Services Evaluation Policy process.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rsep-implementation-notes-2019-04-30-en RSEP Implementation, ICANN Resources]</ref>

* ''The pricing'' influence over the price of registry service;

* ''Market issues'': identification of the market which could be affected, the effects of the ~~changes, other potential significance~~;

[[File:RSEP 2006 to 2017.png|600px|thumbnail|right|Summary Analysis of RSEP Requests: 2006-2017 ([https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rsep-requests-summary-2016-04-20-en ICANN Resources])]]

* ''Allocation issues''

{| cellpadding=10 style="vertical-align:top; text-align:left; color: green; vertical-align:top"

* ''Impact on other markets''

! Years !! Requests !! Factors !!

|-

| 2006 || 4 || First year

|-

| 2006 to 2012 || 8 on average ||

|-

| 2013 to 2017 || 54 on average || The increase in the number of gTLDs

Alignment of service offerings across gTLDs supported by common back-end registry service providers

Requests for release of reserved names

|-

| 2015 to 2017 || drop from 101 to 42 ||

|}

In 2019, [[RySG]] and [[ICANN]] org updated how to implement the policy without altering it to make it easier to understand and more predictable.

==RSEP request assessment==

When determining whether the RSEP request could raise significant competition issues, a review is necessary. The stages and steps followed are listed below:

#The General Counsel reviews the request for determining whether the RSEP request could raise significant competition issues. The following factors are taken into consideration:

#*The pricing influence over the price of registry service;

#*Market issues: identification of the market which could be affected, and the effects of the change;

#*Allocation issues

#*Impact on other markets

# Preliminary determination on competition issues by the General Council

# If no ~~competitions~~ issues are determined, the competition review is considered complete.

# If no competition issues are determined, the competition review is considered complete.

# If there are significant competition issues determined by [[ICANN]] or RSEP request, the appropriate competition authority will be contacted and the jurisdiction applied. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/prelim-competition-issues-en.htm Analysis of the RESP request regarding significant competition issues]</ref>

# If there are significant competition issues determined by [[ICANN]] or RSEP request, the appropriate competition authority will be contacted and the jurisdiction applied.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/prelim-competition-issues-en.htm Analysis of the RESP request regarding significant competition issues]</ref>

==Registry Services==

The registry services which are proposed based on RSEP requests are defined as:

* Services ~~which~~ are critical for the [[RIR]](Regional Internet Registry) to perform tasks related to registrations of domain names, registrars and other related issues.

* Services that are critical for the [[RIR]] (Regional Internet Registry) to perform tasks related to registrations of domain names, registrars, and other related issues.

* Other services and products that the [[RIR]] must provide based on the consensus policy adopted.

* Services which only that specific [[RIR]] is able to provide. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/rsep.html Registry Services ICANN]</ref>

Line 26:

Line 48:

[[Category: Glossary]]

__NOTOC__

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''RSEP''' is the acronym for '''Registry Services Evaluation Process''' and represents the process which was created through [[ICANN]]s consensus for policy development process.
+The '''Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP)''' Process is a set of protocols designed to screen and approve proposals made by [[gTLD]] operators to add or modify registry services. To submit a request for the implementation of new Registry Services, all [[gTLD]]s must take into account RSEP's provisions. The RSEP is required by [[ICANN]] in order to make sure that no significant competition issues are raised.
-==Short overview==
+==History==
-In order to submit a request for the implementation of new Registry Services, all [[gTLD]]s must take into account the RSEP provisions.
+RSEP was created through [[ICANN|ICANN's]] consensus for policy development process.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/prelim-competition-issues-en.htm ICANN.org]</ref>
-The RSEP are being analyze by [[ICANN]] to make sure that no significant competition issues are being raised . There are some preliminary reasonable determination stages which must be followed in order to determine whether the proposes Registry Services raise or not significant competition issues.
-==RESP request assessment==
+On June 30, 2005, the GNSO released its [[PDP]] Final Report on the "Procedure for use by ICANN in considering requests for consent and related contractual amendments to allow changes in the architecture or operation of a gTLD registry."<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/registry-services/final-rpt-registry-approval-10july05.htm#1. RSEP Final Report, GNSO]</ref>
-When determining whether the RESP request could raise significant competition issues, a review is necessary. The stages and steps followed are listed below:
-# The General Council reviews the request for determining whether the RESP request could raise significant competition issues. The following factors are taken into consideration:
+November 8, 2005, the ICANN Board directed that this procedure for considering requests for new Registry Services be guided by the provisions in the [[.net]] [[Registry Agreement]], per the GNSO's recommendation, which became the Registry Services Evaluation Policy process.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rsep-implementation-notes-2019-04-30-en RSEP Implementation, ICANN Resources]</ref>
-* ''The pricing'' influence over the price of registry service;
-* ''Market issues'': identification of the market which could be affected, the effects of the changes, other potential significance;
+[[File:RSEP 2006 to 2017.png|600px|thumbnail|right|Summary Analysis of RSEP Requests: 2006-2017 ([https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rsep-requests-summary-2016-04-20-en ICANN Resources])]]
-* ''Allocation issues''
+{| cellpadding=10 style="vertical-align:top; text-align:left; color: green; vertical-align:top"
-* ''Impact on other markets''
+! Years !! Requests !! Factors !!
+|-
+| 2006 || 4 || First year
+|-
+| 2006 to 2012 || 8 on average ||
+|-
+| 2013 to 2017 || 54 on average || The increase in the number of gTLDs
+Alignment of service offerings across gTLDs supported by common back-end registry service providers
+Requests for release of reserved names
+|-
+| 2015 to 2017 || drop from 101 to 42 ||
+|}
+In 2019, [[RySG]] and [[ICANN]] org updated how to implement the policy without altering it to make it easier to understand and more predictable.
+==RSEP request assessment==
+When determining whether the RSEP request could raise significant competition issues, a review is necessary. The stages and steps followed are listed below:
+#The General Counsel reviews the request for determining whether the RSEP request could raise significant competition issues. The following factors are taken into consideration:
+#*The pricing influence over the price of registry service;
+#*Market issues: identification of the market which could be affected, and the effects of the change;
+#*Allocation issues
+#*Impact on other markets
 # Preliminary determination on competition issues by the General Council
-# If no competitions issues are determined, the competition review is considered complete.
+# If no competition issues are determined, the competition review is considered complete.
-# If there are significant competition issues determined by [[ICANN]] or RSEP request, the appropriate competition authority will be contacted and the jurisdiction applied. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/prelim-competition-issues-en.htm Analysis of the RESP request regarding significant competition issues]</ref>
+# If there are significant competition issues determined by [[ICANN]] or RSEP request, the appropriate competition authority will be contacted and the jurisdiction applied.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/prelim-competition-issues-en.htm Analysis of the RESP request regarding significant competition issues]</ref>
 ==Registry Services==
 The registry services which are proposed based on RSEP requests are defined as:
-* Services which are critical for the [[RIR]](Regional Internet Registry) to perform tasks related to registrations of domain names, registrars and other related issues.
+* Services that are critical for the [[RIR]] (Regional Internet Registry) to perform tasks related to registrations of domain names, registrars, and other related issues.
 * Other services and products that the [[RIR]] must provide based on the consensus policy adopted.
 * Services which only that specific [[RIR]] is able to provide. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/rsep.html Registry Services ICANN]</ref>
@@ Line 26: / Line 48: @@
 [[Category: Glossary]]
 __NOTOC__