Changes

no edit summary
Line 62: Line 62:     
So, I'm all caught up on your editing. If you look at your page there are three articles marked with issues to clear up (out of 100 total that is pretty good!) I've also left the ones with copy& past issues there so I have them readily available to discuss with my coworkers. Thanks again. [[User:Andrew|Andrew]]
 
So, I'm all caught up on your editing. If you look at your page there are three articles marked with issues to clear up (out of 100 total that is pretty good!) I've also left the ones with copy& past issues there so I have them readily available to discuss with my coworkers. Thanks again. [[User:Andrew|Andrew]]
 +
 +
==Batch 7==
 +
You have a tendency to do something like this: "The Asia Pacific Network Information Center (APNIC)" I generally think either the acronym or the full title should be chosen, not both, unless you perhaps are introducing a rather rare/uncommon acronym at the beginning of an article. So if you don't want to link just APNIC, because maybe you've overused the term or you want it to be clear, but still want to to lead to the right article do this: <nowiki>[APNIC|Asia Pacific Networking Group]</nowiki>. That way you don't always have to say both the title and acronym, choose either depending on context but remember to link to the same consistent place. That same consistent link is generally the acronym.