International Trademark Association: Difference between revisions

Line 59:

== INTA and ICANN ==

The INTA was critical of ICANN, telling its members to oppose ICANN’s proposed expression of interest (EOI) process, which it drafted in December, 2009 to solicit entities to submit basic information about themselves and their requests for new [[gTLD]]s. INTA cited that the decision of ICANN to accept pre-registrations was premature and also stressed that the pre-registration process was harmful to trademark holders, as it would force them to register their trademarks defensively in order to protect them.<ref>[http://www.~~goldsteinreport~~.~~com~~/~~article~~.~~php?article=10138 goldsteinreport~~.~~com~~]</ref>

The INTA was critical of ICANN, telling its members to oppose ICANN’s proposed expression of interest (EOI) process, which it drafted in December, 2009 to solicit entities to submit basic information about themselves and their requests for new [[gTLD]]s. INTA cited that the decision of ICANN to accept pre-registrations was premature and also stressed that the pre-registration process was harmful to trademark holders, as it would force them to register their trademarks defensively in order to protect them.

However not all INTA members were supporting the association’s decision. For instance, Minds + Machines, an INTA member, supports the EOI procedures. The Minds + Machines CEO Antony Van Couvering, in his post on the EOI comments area pointed out to ICANN staffers that INTA told its members to flood the EOI comment area with anti-EOI messages which the association thought would be effective in raising their voice against the process. Antony Van Couvering explained why INTA was opposing the EOI procedures in his post. ICANN had committed to resolve the overreaching issues related to the unlimited new gTLD program including Trademark protection, root zone scaling, malicious conduct and economic demand and impact before introducing the new gTLDs. INTA believed that these overreaching issues remained unresolved and that ICANN had not done necessary work that ensures that the potential benefits outweigh the risks, harms and the costs to the domain name system and to the public.<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/lists/draft-eoi-model/msg00024.html forum.icann.org; post from Antony Van Couvering, CEO, Minds + Machines]</ref>

In a letter from Heather Steinmeyer, President, International Trademark Association (INTA) dated September 8, 2010 and from Alen C. Drewson, Executive Director of INTA dated October 12, 2010; INTA showed its willingness to assist ICANN in the identification of trademark protection and analysis of economic impact which it considered two of the overreaching issues that must be resolved before any new gTLDs are introduced.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/steinmeyer-to-dengate-thrush-08sep10-en.pdf letter from Heather Steinmeyer, President, International Trademark Association, September 8, 2010]<ref></ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/drewsen-to-dengate-thrush-12oct10-en.pdf Letter from Alen C. Drewson, Executive Director of International Trademark Association, October 12, 2010]</ref>To this Peter Dengate Thrush, Chairman of the Board of Director of ICANN replied on October 27, 2010 accepting the offer and

allowed INTAs participation in the economic analysis.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/dengate-thrush-to-steinmeyer-drewson-27oct10-en.pdf Letter from Peter Dengate Thrush, Chairman of the Board of Director, ICANN, October 27, 2010]</ref>

INTA had showed its willingness, however, to support ICANN in an economic study aimed to research one of the most overreaching issues identified by ICANN. However, it demanded that the study should take place prior to the launch of any new gTLD program. In response to this, ICANN also accepted the INTA offer over helping ICANN in writing an economic report.

~~<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/drewsen-to-dengate-thrush-12oct10-en.pdf icann.org]</ref>~~

~~<ref>[http://www.managingip.com/Article/2701823/Icann-accepts-INTA-offer-of-help.html managingip.com]</ref>~~

== References ==

[[Category:Glossary]]

[[category: Associations]]

__NOTOC__

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 == INTA and ICANN ==
-The INTA was critical of ICANN, telling its members to oppose ICANN’s proposed expression of interest (EOI) process, which it drafted in December, 2009 to solicit entities to submit basic information about themselves and their requests for new [[gTLD]]s. INTA cited that the decision of ICANN to accept pre-registrations was premature and also stressed that the pre-registration process was harmful to trademark holders, as it would force them to register their trademarks defensively in order to protect them.<ref>[http://www.goldsteinreport.com/article.php?article=10138 goldsteinreport.com]</ref>
+The INTA was critical of ICANN, telling its members to oppose ICANN’s proposed expression of interest (EOI) process, which it drafted in December, 2009 to solicit entities to submit basic information about themselves and their requests for new [[gTLD]]s. INTA cited that the decision of ICANN to accept pre-registrations was premature and also stressed that the pre-registration process was harmful to trademark holders, as it would force them to register their trademarks defensively in order to protect them.
+However not all INTA members were supporting the association’s decision. For instance, Minds + Machines, an INTA member, supports the EOI procedures. The Minds + Machines CEO Antony Van Couvering, in his post on the EOI comments area pointed out to ICANN staffers that INTA told its members to flood the EOI comment area with anti-EOI messages which the association thought would be effective in raising their voice against the process. Antony Van Couvering explained why INTA was opposing the EOI procedures in his post. ICANN had committed to resolve the overreaching issues related to the unlimited new gTLD program including Trademark protection, root zone scaling, malicious conduct and economic demand and impact before introducing the new gTLDs. INTA believed that these overreaching issues remained unresolved and that ICANN had not done necessary work that ensures that the potential benefits outweigh the risks, harms and the costs to the domain name system and to the public.<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/lists/draft-eoi-model/msg00024.html forum.icann.org; post from Antony Van Couvering, CEO, Minds + Machines]</ref>
+In a letter from Heather Steinmeyer, President, International Trademark Association (INTA) dated September 8, 2010 and from Alen C. Drewson, Executive Director of INTA dated October 12, 2010; INTA showed its willingness to assist ICANN in the identification of trademark protection and analysis of economic impact which it considered two of the overreaching issues that must be resolved before any new gTLDs are introduced.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/steinmeyer-to-dengate-thrush-08sep10-en.pdf letter from Heather Steinmeyer, President, International Trademark Association, September 8, 2010]<ref></ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/drewsen-to-dengate-thrush-12oct10-en.pdf Letter from Alen C. Drewson, Executive Director of International Trademark Association, October 12, 2010]</ref>To this Peter Dengate Thrush, Chairman of the Board of Director of ICANN replied on October 27, 2010 accepting the offer and
+allowed INTAs participation in the economic analysis.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/dengate-thrush-to-steinmeyer-drewson-27oct10-en.pdf Letter from Peter Dengate Thrush, Chairman of the Board of Director, ICANN, October 27, 2010]</ref>
-INTA had showed its willingness, however, to support ICANN in an economic study aimed to research one of the most overreaching issues identified by ICANN. However, it demanded that the study should take place prior to the launch of any new gTLD program. In response to this, ICANN also accepted the INTA offer over helping ICANN in writing an economic report.
-<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/drewsen-to-dengate-thrush-12oct10-en.pdf icann.org]</ref>
-<ref>[http://www.managingip.com/Article/2701823/Icann-accepts-INTA-offer-of-help.html managingip.com]</ref>
 == References ==
 {{reflist}}
 [[Category:Glossary]]
 [[category: Associations]]
 __NOTOC__