27,652
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 36:
Line 36: − + − + − + − + − +
→KRNIC and ICANN
==KRNIC and ICANN==
==KRNIC and ICANN==
On November 3, 2000, Chun Eung Hwi, a member of the Name & Number Committee of KRNIC, made the following recommendations to and [[ICANN]] forum regarding new [[gTLD|generic top-level domains]]:<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/tldreport/3A12F5F500000431.html]</ref>
On November 3, 2000, Chun Eung Hwi, a member of the Name & Number Committee of KRNIC, made the following recommendations to and [[ICANN]] forum regarding new [[gTLD|generic top-level domains]]:<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/tldreport/3A12F5F500000431.html]</ref>
# Selection of numerous diverse gTLDs as possible to allow the ICANN and the internet community to evaluate possible impacts of the introduction of new gTLDs and ensure the steady and continuous introduction of new gTLDs in the future.
# Selection of numerous, diverse gTLDs to allow the ICANN and the Internet community to evaluate possible impacts of the introduction of new gTLDs and ensure the steady and continuous introduction of new gTLDs in the future.
# To be able to ease the over-crowding of the .com domain space, several comparable should be selected.
# To ease the over-crowding of the .com domain space, several comparable TLDs should be selected.
# A variety of geographical locations of registry operation should be top priority.
# Allow for a variety of geographical locations of registry operations.
# KRNIC also suggested that gLTD's that are closely related with particular regions like .asia and .africa should not be accepted. The institution reasoned reasoned the this type of gLTD's might cause conflicts in the future if they will be handled by one single commercial entity and if there are no positive consensus from them.
# KRNIC also suggested that gLTD's that are closely related with particular regions like .asia and .africa should not be accepted. The institution reasoned that this type of gLTD may cause conflicts in the future if they are handled by a single commercial entity, and if there are no positive consensus from them.
# ICANN should consider a different approach for new gTLDs representing public interest or non-profit groups, for example ICANN might select new gTLDs and invite for proposals under a special contract & conditions.
# ICANN should consider a different approach for new gTLDs representing public interest or non-profit groups, for example ICANN might select new gTLDs and invite for proposals under a special contract & conditions.
# The total sum of the non-refundable application fee of $50,000 for submission of gTLD should be much more lowered and the institution cited that it is a fundamental barrier in the proposal process. The fee must be determined following the analysis of expenditure details in scrutiny.
# The total sum of the non-refundable application fee of $50,000 for submission of gTLD should be significantly lowered.
# To keep the coherent principle in all gTLDs, two existing gTLDs, [[.gov]], and [[.mil]], should be transformed to the 2nd level subdomains of .us domain.
# To keep the coherent principle in all gTLDs, two existing gTLDs, [[.gov]], and [[.mil]], should be transformed to the 2nd level subdomains of .us domain.