Talk:Stephan Ramoin: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
oops forgot that external links only require one bracket |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't want to mess with Ramoin's career history as I have with other pages. While most career sections seem to have little information beyond title, location, date, Ramoin's has a lot of interesting and pertinent info. And while I lean to reading information in reverse chronology, like in most resumes, I could see the argument for keeping it as is- in earliest to present day- as is done on wikipedia.org.. Thoughts? [[User:Apm|Andrew Merriam]] | I don't want to mess with Ramoin's career history as I have with other pages. While most career sections seem to have little information beyond title, location, date, Ramoin's has a lot of interesting and pertinent info. And while I lean to reading information in reverse chronology, like in most resumes, I could see the argument for keeping it as is- in earliest to present day- as is done on wikipedia.org.. Thoughts? [[User:Apm|Andrew Merriam]] | ||
: Yes, I'm ok with either order, but think that we should decide and keep it consistent throughout the site. And also when in doubt, | : Yes, I'm ok with either order, but think that we should decide and keep it consistent throughout the site. And also when in doubt, [http://en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia] is a good guide for us. [[User:Ray|Ray]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:51, 8 January 2011
I don't want to mess with Ramoin's career history as I have with other pages. While most career sections seem to have little information beyond title, location, date, Ramoin's has a lot of interesting and pertinent info. And while I lean to reading information in reverse chronology, like in most resumes, I could see the argument for keeping it as is- in earliest to present day- as is done on wikipedia.org.. Thoughts? Andrew Merriam