Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,005 bytes removed ,  12 years ago
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
[[Image:UnderConstruction.png]]
 
[[Image:UnderConstruction.png]]
   −
The '''Policy Process Steering Committee''' ('''PPSC''') was established to review and recommend changes for [[GNSO]] policy-making processes. The main goal of PPSC was to develop recommendations for the process changes required by the GNSO Improvements Report and acknowledged by the Board.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/3.+SC+Charter SC Charter]</ref> The PPSC consisted of two teams, the [[Policy Development Process Work Team]] and the [[Working Group Work Team]]. The PPSC was terminated when the GNSO adopted the resolution 20110428-2 at its meeting held on 28 April 2011, although the Policy Development Process Work Team is still active.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/PPSC+-+Home PPSC Home]</ref>
+
The '''Policy Process Steering Committee''' ('''PPSC''') was established to review and recommend changes for the [[GNSO]] policy-making processes. The main goal of PPSC was to develop recommendations for the process changes required by the GNSO Improvements Report and acknowledged by the Board.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/3.+SC+Charter SC Charter]</ref> The PPSC was terminated when the GNSO adopted the resolution 20110428-2 at its meeting held on 28 April 2011, although the Policy Development Process Work Team is still active.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/PPSC+-+Home PPSC Home]</ref>
    
The PPSC was also assigned with the task of combining the results into a proposal, consisting of suggested bylaws changes for PDP process and guidelines for the working groups.  
 
The PPSC was also assigned with the task of combining the results into a proposal, consisting of suggested bylaws changes for PDP process and guidelines for the working groups.  
Line 10: Line 10:  
== PPSC Work Teams ==
 
== PPSC Work Teams ==
   −
The PPSC had two working teams, the first team known as the WG team was assigned with the job of developing a proposal for the sake of a new Working Group Model whereas the other team was known as the policy development process team or the PDP Team. The PPSC served as a coordinating body for these two teams.  
+
The PPSC consisted of two teams, the [[Policy Development Process Work Team]] and the [[Working Group Work Team]]. The PDP-WT was tasked with developing a new policy development process, while the WG-WT was tasked with developing a new Working Group Model. The PPSC itself served as a coordinating body for these two teams.  
 
      
'''Policy Development Process Work Team:''' Also known as the PDP-WT, this team was responsible for recommending changes to the Council and the community on the basis of an open community WG approach. It was responsible of reviewing the PDP in the Bylaws.  
 
'''Policy Development Process Work Team:''' Also known as the PDP-WT, this team was responsible for recommending changes to the Council and the community on the basis of an open community WG approach. It was responsible of reviewing the PDP in the Bylaws.  
Line 37: Line 36:     
* GAC liaison: [[Bertrand de la Chapelle]]
 
* GAC liaison: [[Bertrand de la Chapelle]]
* ALAC liaison: [[Alan Greenberg]], alternate: [[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]].<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/3.+SC+Charter SC Charter]</ref>
+
* ALAC liaison: [[Alan Greenberg]], alternate: [[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]].
 
  −
== Decision making of PPSC ==
  −
 
  −
The decision making process of PPSC if not determined by the PPSC members, were taken by using "full consensus of the members" process.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/3.+SC+Charter SC Charter]</ref>
     −
'''Important Decision making process points:'''
+
Unless otherwise determined, the decision-making process used by the PPSC was to be made using a “full consensus of the members” process.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/3.+SC+Charter SC Charter]</ref>
# PPSC recognizes that determining a “Rough Consensus”; where all point of views are discussed till the chair decides all possible perspectives have been covered, is an important issue that must be handled by the working Group WT.
  −
# PPSC WT must strive to reach at a unanimous decision but it also realizes that this may not always be possible.
  −
# All the Work Team rules are subject to change by the PPSC that can be according to the PPSC’s evaluation of Working Group Work Team’s recommendations.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/13598746/PPSC+interim+work+team+rules+draft+revised+18+Feb+2009+clean-1.doc?version=1&modificationDate=1302113143000 Interim Work Team Rules] revised 18 Feb 2009, Retrieved 20 May 2011</ref>
      
== References ==
 
== References ==
14,326

edits

Navigation menu