9,082
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 43:
Line 43: − + + + + + + + + + − * ICANN’s proposed 2011 Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency <ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_Enhancing_Security_Stability_Resiliency_2010-11.pdf Comments on ICANN’s proposed 2011 Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency]</ref>+ − * ICANN Whois Review Team <ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_WHOIS_Review_2011-04.pdf Comments on Whois Review Team]</ref> − * ICANN’s Draft FY2012 Budget <ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_Budget_Comments-2011-06.pdf Comments on ICANN’s Draft FY2012 Budget]</ref>
→ICANN Involvement
MAAWAG also provided comments on the following issues:
MAAWAG also provided comments on the following issues:
* '''ICANN Study on the Prevalence of Domain Names Registered using a Privacy or Proxy Registration Service among the top 5 [[gTLD]]s'''
* '''ICANN Study on the Prevalence of Domain Names Registered using a Privacy or Proxy Registration Service among the top 5 [[gTLD]]s'''
MAAWAG commented that the result of ICANN's study that approximately 20% of domains use proxy or privacy service is consistent with their observation including the fact that majority of those 20% do not provide any information regarding the beneficial user's identity. In addition. MAAWAG encouraged ICANN to further investigate if there are TLDs/Registrars with disproportionately high or low number of proxy or privacy registration.<ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_Study_Prevalence_Domains%202010-10.pdf ICANN Study on the Prevalence of Domain Names Registered using a Privacy or Proxy Registration Service among the top 5 gTLDs]</ref>
MAAWAG commented that the result of ICANN's study that approximately 20% of domains use proxy or privacy service is consistent with their observation including the fact that majority of those 20% do not provide any information regarding the beneficial user's identity. In addition. MAAWAG encouraged ICANN to further investigate if there are TLDs/Registrars with disproportionately high or low number of proxy or privacy registration. Furthermore, the organization also agree that ICANN's plan to conduct further proxy/privacy study to document the
relay and reveal practices of proxy/privacy services is important and encouraged ICANN to implement its plan the soonest possible time.
<ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_Study_Prevalence_Domains%202010-10.pdf ICANN Study on the Prevalence of Domain Names Registered using a Privacy or Proxy Registration Service among the top 5 gTLDs]</ref>
* '''ICANN’s proposed 2011 Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency'''
MAAWAG concurred that ICANN should define its limited role in security, stability and resiliency of the internet in the 2009 plan to avoid "mission creep" into inappropriate areas. MAAWAG also emphasized that ICANN must recognize the extent of mission and role in relationship with other organizations. The organization cited that ICANN's primary mission is related to the domain name system and its role is to ensure that the stability, security, resilience and scalability of the internet is always maintained. MAAWAG also pointed that ICANN's is also responsible in collaborating with different organizations, government agencies and the global internet community in fighting against abuse of the [[DNS]].
<ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_Enhancing_Security_Stability_Resiliency_2010-11.pdf Comments on ICANN’s proposed 2011 Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency]</ref>
* '''ICANN Whois Review Team'''
MAAWAG recommended that ICANN should require registries to adopt the "thick" [[WHOis]] Service to be able to provide reliable service and standardized report formats. The organization is against the proposal that only law enforcement agencies are allowed to have access to the Whois database and suggested that the accuracy and reliability of the Whois service should be maintained.In addition, MAAWAG encouraged ICANN to provide a quarterly summary report on the volume of inaccuracy incident reports received through the '''WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System (WDPRS)''' and encouraged the Whois Review Team to include technological improvements on the Whois service.<ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_WHOIS_Review_2011-04.pdf Comments on Whois Review Team]</ref>
* '''ICANN’s Draft FY2012 Budget'''
<ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_Budget_Comments-2011-06.pdf Comments on ICANN’s Draft FY2012 Budget]</ref>
==Senior Technical Advisors==
==Senior Technical Advisors==