Changes

* '''ICANN’s proposed 2011 Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency'''- MAAWAG concurred that ICANN should define its limited role in security, stability and resiliency of the internet in the 2009 plan to avoid "mission creep" into inappropriate areas. MAAWAG also emphasized that ICANN must recognize the extent of mission and role in relationship with other organizations. The organization cited that ICANN's primary mission is related to the domain name system and its role is to ensure that the stability, security, resilience and scalability of the internet is always maintained. MAAWAG also pointed that ICANN's is also responsible in collaborating with different organizations, government agencies and the global internet community in fighting against abuse of the [[DNS]].<ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_Enhancing_Security_Stability_Resiliency_2010-11.pdf Comments on ICANN’s proposed 2011 Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency]</ref>

* '''ICANN’s proposed 2011 Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency'''- MAAWAG concurred that ICANN should define its limited role in security, stability and resiliency of the internet in the 2009 plan to avoid "mission creep" into inappropriate areas. MAAWAG also emphasized that ICANN must recognize the extent of mission and role in relationship with other organizations. The organization cited that ICANN's primary mission is related to the domain name system and its role is to ensure that the stability, security, resilience and scalability of the internet is always maintained. MAAWAG also pointed that ICANN's is also responsible in collaborating with different organizations, government agencies and the global internet community in fighting against abuse of the [[DNS]].<ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_Enhancing_Security_Stability_Resiliency_2010-11.pdf Comments on ICANN’s proposed 2011 Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency]</ref>

* '''ICANN Whois Review Team'''- MAAWAG recommended that ICANN should require registries to adopt the "thick" [[Whois]] Service  to be able to provide reliable service and standardized report formats. The organization is against the proposal that only law enforcement agencies are allowed to have access to the Whois database and suggested that the accuracy and reliability of the Whois service should be maintained.In addition, MAAWAG encouraged ICANN to provide a quarterly summary report on  the volume of inaccuracy incident reports received through the '''WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System (WDPRS)''' and encouraged the Whois Review Team to include technological improvements on the Whois service.<ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_WHOIS_Review_2011-04.pdf Comments on Whois Review Team]</ref>

* '''ICANN Whois Review Team'''- MAAWAG recommended that ICANN should require registries to adopt the "thick" [[Whois]] Service  to be able to provide reliable service and standardized report formats. The organization is against the proposal that only law enforcement agencies are allowed to have access to the Whois database and suggested that the accuracy and reliability of the Whois service should be maintained.In addition, MAAWAG encouraged ICANN to provide a quarterly summary report on  the volume of inaccuracy incident reports received through the '''WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System (WDPRS)''' and encouraged the Whois Review Team to include technological improvements on the Whois service.<ref>[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_WHOIS_Review_2011-04.pdf Comments on Whois Review Team]</ref>

*  '''ICANN’s Draft FY2012 Budget'''

*  '''ICANN’s Draft FY2012 Budget'''- MAAWAG reviewed the proposed ICANN budget for fiscal year 2012 and emphasized that the organization commended the global internet governing body's budget allocation on important areas as its priority such as:<ref>

MAAWAG reviewed the proposed ICANN budget for fiscal year 2012 and emphasized that the organization commended the global internet governing body's budget allocation on important areas as its priority such as:<ref>

[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_Budget_Comments-2011-06.pdf  Comments on ICANN’s Draft FY2012 Budget]</ref>

[http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_ICANN_Budget_Comments-2011-06.pdf  Comments on ICANN’s Draft FY2012 Budget]</ref>

# Registrar Oversight

# Registrar Oversight