Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
59 bytes removed ,  12 years ago
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
[[Image:UnderConstruction.png]]
  −
   
{{CompanyInfo|
 
{{CompanyInfo|
 
| logo            = Intel.JPG
 
| logo            = Intel.JPG
Line 24: Line 22:     
'''Intel Corporation''' is the the world's largest semiconductor manufacturer and the inventor of the first microprocessor. Eighty percent of computer worldwide use Intel microchips. The company also designs and manufactures other advance computing and communications components including flash memory, graphic chips, embedded processors, motherboard chip sets, network interface controllers and integrated circuits. Intel was established in 1968 and its headquarters is located in Santa Clara, California.<ref>[http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/84/Intel-Corporation.html Reference for Business, Intel Corporation]</ref>
 
'''Intel Corporation''' is the the world's largest semiconductor manufacturer and the inventor of the first microprocessor. Eighty percent of computer worldwide use Intel microchips. The company also designs and manufactures other advance computing and communications components including flash memory, graphic chips, embedded processors, motherboard chip sets, network interface controllers and integrated circuits. Intel was established in 1968 and its headquarters is located in Santa Clara, California.<ref>[http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/84/Intel-Corporation.html Reference for Business, Intel Corporation]</ref>
 +
 +
==Intel and ICANN==
 +
On January 26, 2010, Intel expressed its disappointment regarding the Special Trademark Issues Working Team ([[STI]]) Report on Trademark Protection on New [[gTLD]]s. The company cited that majority of the protection rights strategies or mechanisms recommended by the Implementation Recommendation Team ([[IRT]]) intended to create an overall system for trademark rights were not incorporated in the report. Intel emphasized that, the STI report is lacking to protect trademark rights and urged [[ICANN]] to reconsider incorporating some of the IRT recommendations. Meanwhile Intel acknowledged the benefits of a [[Trademark Clearing House]] as an implementing tool tool to protect trademarks. The company suggested it should be used new and existing gTLDs during the pre-launch, Uniform Rapid Suspension ([[URS]] process and during Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy ([[UDRP]]) proceedings. Information submitted to the Trademark Clearing House should only be shared to registries and registrars for the purpose of supporting RPM procedures unless authorized by trademark owners to use the information for other purpose. Fees to submit trademarks to the Trademark Clearing House should be minimal. Regarding the issue on URS, Intel agrees that the tool is also beneficial as long as the process is less expensive and quicker.<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/lists/sti-report-2009/msg00068.html Intel Corporation Comments on STI Report]</ref>
    
==Timeline==
 
==Timeline==
Line 110: Line 111:  
"Intel has harmed millions of European consumers by deliberately acting to keep competitors out of the market for computer chips for many years." On the other hand, Intel Chairman Paul Otellini said that the company will appeal the decision and the Commission failed to acknowledge the reality of a highly competitive microprocessor market.<ref>[http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1897913,00.html The Chips Are Down: Intel's $1.45 Billion Fine]</ref>
 
"Intel has harmed millions of European consumers by deliberately acting to keep competitors out of the market for computer chips for many years." On the other hand, Intel Chairman Paul Otellini said that the company will appeal the decision and the Commission failed to acknowledge the reality of a highly competitive microprocessor market.<ref>[http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1897913,00.html The Chips Are Down: Intel's $1.45 Billion Fine]</ref>
   −
==Intel and ICANN==
  −
On January 26, 2010, Intel expressed its disappointment regarding the Special Trademark Issues Working Team ([[STI]]) Report on Trademark Protection on New [[gTLD]]s. The company cited that majority of the protection rights strategies or mechanisms recommended by the Implementation Recommendation Team ([[IRT]]) intended to create an overall system for trademark rights were not incorporated in the report. Intel emphasized that, the STI report is lacking to protect trademark rights and urged [[ICANN]] to reconsider incorporating some of the IRT recommendations. Meanwhile Intel acknowledged the benefits of a [[Trademark Clearing House]] as an implementing tool tool to protect trademarks. The company suggested it should be used new and existing gTLDs during the pre-launch, Uniform Rapid Suspension ([[URS]] process and during Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy ([[UDRP]]) proceedings. Information submitted to the Trademark Clearing House should only be shared to registries and registrars for the purpose of supporting RPM procedures unless authorized by trademark owners to use the information for other purpose. Fees to submit trademarks to the Trademark Clearing House should be minimal. Regarding the issue on URS, Intel agrees that the tool is also beneficial as long as the process is less expensive and quicker.<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/lists/sti-report-2009/msg00068.html Intel Corporation Comments on STI Report]</ref>
      
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
      
[[Category:Companies]]
 
[[Category:Companies]]

Navigation menu