Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency: Difference between revisions

Line 42:

* NPOC suggested to further define the role of Independent Objector (IO) in connection with IO selection, IO support, IO application review and IP decision, if it is necessary to object or not.

* It was recommended that marks not protected by court or statute should be submitted to the Trademark Clearinghouse periodically (every 3 years) and must be a requirement during the [[Sunrise Period]]. In addition, the expansion of trademark claims and Sunrise Period services was also recommended by the constituency as well as the reduction of Clearinghouse filing fees for non-profit organizations.

* It was also recommended that the Uniform Rapid Suspension ([[URS]]) for non-profit organization ~~and to reduce the requirements for the limited loser pays to complaints for 8 or more domain names in dispute from the current 26 domain names in dispute.~~<ref>[http://www.npoc.org/images/NPOC_ApplicantGuidebook_Comments_05-15-11.pdf Applicant Guidebook Comments, May 15, 2011]</ref>

* It was also recommended that the Uniform Rapid Suspension ([[URS]]) fees be reduced for non-profit organization<ref>[http://www.npoc.org/images/NPOC_ApplicantGuidebook_Comments_05-15-11.pdf Applicant Guidebook Comments, May 15, 2011]</ref>

NPOC's compilation of comments on the different [[DNS]] Policy Issues of ICANN can be found [http://www.npoc.org/icannsubmittedcomments.html here].

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 * NPOC suggested to further define the role of Independent Objector (IO) in connection with IO selection, IO support, IO application review and IP decision, if it is necessary to object or not.
 * It was recommended that marks not protected by court or statute should be submitted to the Trademark Clearinghouse periodically (every 3 years) and must be a requirement during the [[Sunrise Period]]. In addition, the expansion of trademark claims and Sunrise Period services was also recommended by the constituency as well as the reduction of Clearinghouse filing fees for non-profit organizations.
-* It was also recommended that the Uniform Rapid Suspension ([[URS]]) for non-profit organization and to reduce the requirements for the limited loser pays to complaints for 8 or more domain names in dispute from the current 26 domain names in dispute.<ref>[http://www.npoc.org/images/NPOC_ApplicantGuidebook_Comments_05-15-11.pdf Applicant Guidebook Comments, May 15, 2011]</ref>
+* It was also recommended that the Uniform Rapid Suspension ([[URS]]) fees be reduced for non-profit organization<ref>[http://www.npoc.org/images/NPOC_ApplicantGuidebook_Comments_05-15-11.pdf Applicant Guidebook Comments, May 15, 2011]</ref>
 NPOC's compilation of comments on the different [[DNS]] Policy Issues of ICANN can be found [http://www.npoc.org/icannsubmittedcomments.html here].