Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse: Difference between revisions

* '''ICANN Should Combine the Registry Restrictions Dispute Resolution Procedure ([[RRDRP]]) and ([[PDDRP]])'''

CADNA has been critical to the ICANN new gTLD program claiming that it is premature and it lacks transparency, however the organization clarified that is not totally against the introduction of new TLDs.<ref>

[http://www.cadna.org/en/blog?page=2 CADNA Letter to the Editor]</ref> The organization's position that it is not totally against the introduction of new TLDs was clarified when [[Josh Bourne]], President of CADNA, sent a letter to ICANN President and CEO [[Rod Beckstrom]] asking the internet governing body to disclose the schedule for future rounds of new gTLD applications apart from the inaugural January 2012 schedule. According to Bourne, after conducting the conference entitled ''"What's at Stake: The Reality of ICANN's New gTLD Program for Brands,"'' the participants concluded to submit a proposal to [[ICANN Board]] and '''"Request an Issues Report to formally initiate a policy development process to determine when the next round of new gTLD applications will occur, thereby affirming its commitment to opening a second round in a timely manner."''' Bourne emphasized that CADNA does not object the promotion of innovation and improved competition of the Internet through TLD expansion; however, he said that the scheduled new gTLD program does not meet that objective. Furthermore, Bourne said that if ICANN will reveal a second round of applications, it might help ease the anxiety of businesses and subdue their hostility regarding the upcoming implementation of the new gTLD program because it will give them the opportunity to prepare and participate in the program. As is, with the dates of future rounds unknown, many companies fear a market scarcity and feel obliged to rush an application immediately, before being able to weigh the costs and benefits.<ref>