Changes

In September, 2011, Mr. Cahn updated his claims of breach of contract and fraud after a judge tossed out his original claim. The new claim now contains specific language on how Oversee.net allegedly affected Moniker's revenue. He now states that the original acquisition was in violation of an agreement between [[Google]] and Oversee, and that Oversee improperly deflated Moniker's revenue and performance numbers.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/09/08/monte-cahn-updates-lawsuit-against-oversee-net-with-new-details/ Monte Cahn Updates Lawsuit, DomainNameWire.com]</ref>

In September, 2011, Mr. Cahn updated his claims of breach of contract and fraud after a judge tossed out his original claim. The new claim now contains specific language on how Oversee.net allegedly affected Moniker's revenue. He now states that the original acquisition was in violation of an agreement between [[Google]] and Oversee, and that Oversee improperly deflated Moniker's revenue and performance numbers.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/09/08/monte-cahn-updates-lawsuit-against-oversee-net-with-new-details/ Monte Cahn Updates Lawsuit, DomainNameWire.com]</ref>

In November, 2011, Oversee countered against parts of Mr. Cahn's lawsuit addressing his Management Incentive Plan. It seems that they had set targets for bonuses and Oversee is denying that those marks were met and thus, that they believe they owe Monte Cahn nothing for the MIP and requested summary judgement on the matter.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/17/oversee-net-we-dont-owe-monte-cahn-anything-for-13m-management-incentive-plan/ Oversee.net We Don't Ow Monte Cahn Anything for 13M MIP, DomainNameWire.com]</ref> Monte Cahn, expectedly, countered this claim.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/23/monte-cahn-files-third-ammended-complaint-against-oversee-net/ Monte Cahn Files Third Ammended Complaint Against Oversee.net, DomainNameWire.com]</ref>

In November, 2011, Oversee countered against parts of Mr. Cahn's lawsuit addressing his Management Incentive Plan. It seems that they had set targets for bonuses and Oversee is denying that those marks were met and thus, that they believe they owe Monte Cahn nothing for the MIP and requested summary judgement on the matter.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/17/oversee-net-we-dont-owe-monte-cahn-anything-for-13m-management-incentive-plan/ Oversee.net We Don't Ow Monte Cahn Anything for 13M MIP, DomainNameWire.com]</ref> Monte Cahn, expectedly, countered this claim.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/23/monte-cahn-files-third-ammended-complaint-against-oversee-net/ Monte Cahn Files Third Ammended Complaint Against Oversee.net, DomainNameWire.com]</ref> In December, 2011, it was decided that their legal battle over the MIP would not be a jury trial and the case will thus be argued in front of the court.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/12/22/no-jury-trial-over-incentive-plan-in-monte-cahn-v-oversee-net/ No Jury Trial Over Incentive Plan in Monte Cahn v Oversee.net, DomainNameWire.com]</ref>

==Current Work==

==Current Work==