Difference between revisions of ".loans"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
There is also an applicant for the singular version, [[.loan]], [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Loan Limited)
 
There is also an applicant for the singular version, [[.loan]], [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Loan Limited)
 +
 +
===Donuts===
 +
The application was issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref> The warning states that the TLD refers to a regulated market but that the applicant has not provided for adequate measures to protect from consumer harm.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Loans-AU-18264.pdf?version=2&modificationDate=1353388613000 Loans AU, GACweb.ICANN.org]</ref> Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 16:20, 25 November 2012

Status: Proposed
Type: Generic
Category: Commerce

More information: NTLDStatsLogo.png

.loans is a proposed new TLD in ICANN's new gTLD Program.

Current Applicants

  1. Radix, .loans is one of 31 applications submitted by the company.[1]
  2. Donuts (June Woods, LLC), the company has applied for 307 TLDs

There is also an applicant for the singular version, .loan, Famous Four Media (dot Loan Limited)

Donuts

The application was issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[2] The warning states that the TLD refers to a regulated market but that the applicant has not provided for adequate measures to protect from consumer harm.[3] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref>

References