.est: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TLD| | {{TLD| | ||
|logo = | |logo = | ||
|status = Withdrawn | |status = '''Withdrawn''' | ||
|manager = [[Charleston Road Registry Inc.]] ([[Google]]) | |manager = [[Charleston Road Registry Inc.]] ([[Google]]) | ||
|country = | |country = | ||
Revision as of 15:39, 4 January 2013
| Status: | Withdrawn |
| Manager: | Charleston Road Registry Inc. (Google) |
| Registry Provider: | Charleston Road Registry Inc. |
| Type: | Generic |
| Category: | Lifestyle |
More information: 
| |
.est was one of 101 TLDs applied for by Google through its subsidiary Charleston Road Registry Inc.; it was applied for as a type of "domain hack", to create URLs like fast.est/car.
The application was later criticized as flying directly in the face of ICANN's applicant guidebook given that it clearly lays out that geographic and territory names on the ISO 3166-1 standard list are protected. ARE is on that list as a designation of the United Arab Emirates. Thus, it was quickly suggested that the application will be rejected outright.[1] Google also applied for .are and .and, which have the same conflict.[2] In September, 2012, it was noted that Google had withdrawn all three applications.[3]