27,652
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + + +
no edit summary
The warnings are nearly identical and state that the applicant should consider withdrawal or implement an objection procedure to consider geographical indications, as "vin" is a term that is strictly and clearly defined by French and European law.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Vin-FR-23177.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353451842000 Vin FR, GACweb.ICANN.org]</ref>
The warnings are nearly identical and state that the applicant should consider withdrawal or implement an objection procedure to consider geographical indications, as "vin" is a term that is strictly and clearly defined by French and European law.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Vin-FR-23177.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353451842000 Vin FR, GACweb.ICANN.org]</ref>
Donuts replied to France´s warning to .vin, and its similar objections for [[.health]], [[.sarl]], [[.hotel]], and [[.architect]], with an impassioned defense of the validity of open registration for New gTLDs. They even to quote the GAC's own advice with regards to its contract with [[.xxx]] registry provider, [[ICM Registry]], which notes that at that time the GAC was against any monitoring of TLD content given that it seems to overstep ICANN's technical mandate.<ref>[http://donuts.co/news/files/donuts_reply_to_france_ARCHITECT_HEALTH_HOTEL_SARL_VIN.pdf Donuts reply to France, donuts.co]Published February 5 2013, Retrieved 8 Feb 2013</ref>
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}