Difference between revisions of ".poker"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Applicants== | ==Applicants== | ||
# [[Afilias]] | # [[Afilias]] | ||
− | # [[Donuts]] (Binky Mill, LLC) | + | # [[Donuts]] (Binky Mill, LLC) - The applicant has submitted [[PIC|Public Interest Commitments]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/630 here]. |
− | # [[Dot Poker LLC]] | + | # [[Dot Poker LLC]] - The applicant has submitted [[PIC|Public Interest Commitments]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/478 here]. |
− | # [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Poker Limited)<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Poker Status, ICANN.org]</ref> | + | # [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Poker Limited)<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Poker Status, ICANN.org]</ref> - The applicant has submitted [[PIC|Public Interest Commitments]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/1225 here]. |
==Objection== | ==Objection== |
Revision as of 01:48, 13 March 2013
Status: | Proposed |
country: | International |
Type: | Generic |
Category: | Lifestyle |
Priority #: | 229 - Famous Four Media (dot Poker Limited) 471 - Donuts (Binky Mill, LLC) 1638 - Dot Poker LLC 1662 - Afilias |
More information: |
.poker is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.
Applicants[edit | edit source]
- Afilias
- Donuts (Binky Mill, LLC) - The applicant has submitted Public Interest Commitments, which can be downloaded here.
- Dot Poker LLC - The applicant has submitted Public Interest Commitments, which can be downloaded here.
- Famous Four Media (dot Poker Limited)[1] - The applicant has submitted Public Interest Commitments, which can be downloaded here.
Objection[edit | edit source]
Saudi Arabia's Communications and Information Technology Commission (CITC) filed an objection against the TLD.[2]