Jump to content

.finance: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
|category = [[:Category:Commerce New gTLDs|Commerce]]
|category = [[:Category:Commerce New gTLDs|Commerce]]
|community  =
|community  =
PIC = [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/770 Download Here]
|PIC = [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/770 Download Here]
|priority = 1766 - [[Donuts]] (Cotton Cypress, LLC)
|priority = 1766 - [[Donuts]] (Cotton Cypress, LLC)
|keypeople  =
|keypeople  =

Revision as of 15:25, 13 March 2013

Status: Proposed
Type: Generic
Category: Commerce
PIC Submitted: Download Here
Priority #: 1766 - Donuts (Cotton Cypress, LLC)

More information:

.finance is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program. The applicant is Donuts (Cotton Cypress, LLC).[1]

The application was issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[2] The warning notes that the TLD refers to a regulated market but that the applicant has not provided for adequate measures to protect from consumer harm.[3]

European Commission Communiqué[edit | edit source]

The European Commission flagged the application for .finance outside of ICANN's defined remediation processes.

Just after ICANN's GAC issued its Early Warnings, which are advice given from one GAC member country to an applicant warning it of potential issues within its application, the European Commission issued a letter to all applicants within the new gTLD program. The letter highlights 58 applications that "could raise issues of compatibility with the existing legislation .. and/or with policy positions and objectives of the European Union." It notes a desire to open a dialogue with each offending applicant.

The Commission specifically notes that this objection is not a part of the GAC Early Warning process, and goes on to note that "the Commission does not consider itself legally bound to [ICANN] processes," given that there is not legal agreement between the two bodies.[4][5]

References[edit | edit source]