.cheap: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TLD| | {{TLD| | ||
|logo = | |logo = | ||
|status = | |status = Contract Signed | ||
|manager = | |manager = | ||
|country = | |country = | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
===Application Details=== | ===Application Details=== | ||
Many of [[Donuts]]' applications, including this one, seem to have been applied for using the same boiler-plate application in which the TLD is defined as a means of providing greater expression on the Internet and will be an open TLD without pre-registration policies. It notes its plans to adhere with all registration policies required by ICANN and its intent to have remediation and takedown policies clearly defined to fit within these requirements. Pre-registration verification will not be used and this as defined as causing "cause more harm than benefit by denying domain access to legitimate registrants." They intend to control abuse through "extensive user and rights protections."<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/887 ApplicationDetails, gTLDresult.ICANN.org]Retrieved 12 Dec 2012</ref> | Many of [[Donuts]]' applications, including this one, seem to have been applied for using the same boiler-plate application in which the TLD is defined as a means of providing greater expression on the Internet and will be an open TLD without pre-registration policies. It notes its plans to adhere with all registration policies required by ICANN and its intent to have remediation and takedown policies clearly defined to fit within these requirements. Pre-registration verification will not be used and this as defined as causing "cause more harm than benefit by denying domain access to legitimate registrants." They intend to control abuse through "extensive user and rights protections."<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/887 ApplicationDetails, gTLDresult.ICANN.org]Retrieved 12 Dec 2012</ref> | ||
===Contract Signed=== | |||
On 14 November 2013, [[Donuts]] received a [[Registry Agreement]] signed by [[ICANN]] for .cheap after passing all the required processes needed to become a [[Registry Operator]] for the string.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/registries Registry Agreements, ICANN.org] Retrieved 15 Nov 2013</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Line 25: | Line 29: | ||
[[Category:TLD]] | [[Category:TLD]] | ||
[[Category:Commerce New gTLDs|cheap]] | [[Category:Commerce New gTLDs|cheap]] | ||
[[Category:TLDs with Registry Agreements|cheap]] |
Revision as of 19:20, 15 November 2013
Status: | Contract Signed |
Type: | Generic |
Category: | Commerce |
PIC Submitted: | Download Here |
More information: |
.cheap is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program. The applicant is Donuts (Sand Cover, LLC).[1]
Application Details[edit | edit source]
Many of Donuts' applications, including this one, seem to have been applied for using the same boiler-plate application in which the TLD is defined as a means of providing greater expression on the Internet and will be an open TLD without pre-registration policies. It notes its plans to adhere with all registration policies required by ICANN and its intent to have remediation and takedown policies clearly defined to fit within these requirements. Pre-registration verification will not be used and this as defined as causing "cause more harm than benefit by denying domain access to legitimate registrants." They intend to control abuse through "extensive user and rights protections."[2]
Contract Signed[edit | edit source]
On 14 November 2013, Donuts received a Registry Agreement signed by ICANN for .cheap after passing all the required processes needed to become a Registry Operator for the string.[3]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings
- ↑ ApplicationDetails, gTLDresult.ICANN.orgRetrieved 12 Dec 2012
- ↑ Registry Agreements, ICANN.org Retrieved 15 Nov 2013