6,681
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: + +
→Reception by New gTLD Applicants
[[Donuts]] initially reacted to the Interisle Report and ICANN's response by saying: "We also think that name collision is an overstated issue. Rather than take the overdone step of halting or delaying these TLDs, if the issue really is such a concern, it would be wiser to focus on the second-level names where a conflict could occur."<ref name="reactions"></ref>
[[Donuts]] initially reacted to the Interisle Report and ICANN's response by saying: "We also think that name collision is an overstated issue. Rather than take the overdone step of halting or delaying these TLDs, if the issue really is such a concern, it would be wiser to focus on the second-level names where a conflict could occur."<ref name="reactions"></ref>
[[Uniregistry]]'s [[Frank Schilling]] stated: "We are deeply dismayed by this new report, both by its substance and its timing."<ref name="reactions"></ref>
[[Famous Four Media]] has this to say: "Famous Four Media’s primary concern is the security and stability of the Internet. Since this is in the interest of all parties involved in the new gTLD program from registries to registrants and all in between Famous Four Media welcomes these proposals."<ref name="reactions"></ref>
==Alternative Path to Delegation==
==Alternative Path to Delegation==