icannwiki

Brandon Gray Internet Services Inc.: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
the changes to this page are factual and must remain
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| type            = Privately Held
| type            = Privately Held
| industry        = Domain Name Registry
| industry        = Domain Name Registry
| headquarters    = Markham, Ontario L3R 8B5
| headquarters    = 50 Acadia Avenue, Suite 302 Markham, Ontario L3R 0B3
| country        = Canada
| country        = Canada
| website        = https://namejuice.com
| website        = https://namejuice.com
Line 12: Line 12:
'''Brandon Gray Internet Services, Inc.''' is an [[ICANN]] accredited domain name registry operator based in Ontario Canada. It operates under its different resellers names such as:
'''Brandon Gray Internet Services, Inc.''' is an [[ICANN]] accredited domain name registry operator based in Ontario Canada. It operates under its different resellers names such as:


# [[Namejuice.com]]
* [[Namejuice.com]]
# [[ENom]] Inc.
* [[Domain Registry of America]]
# [[Domain Registry of America]]
* [[Domain Renewal Group]]
# [[Domain Renewal Group]]
* [[Domain Registry of Australia]]
# [[Domain Registry of Australia]]
* [[Domain Registry of Canada]]
# [[Domain Registry of Canada]]
* [[Domain Registry of Europe]]
# [[Domain Registry of Europe]]
* [[Registration Services Inc.]]
# [[Internet Registry of Canada]]
# [[Liberty Names of America]]
# [[Registration Services Inc.]]
# [[Yellow Business.ca]]


==Services==
==Services==
Line 32: Line 28:


==Controversies==
==Controversies==
Brandon Gray Internet Services received numerous complaints from customers as well as other domain registry operators because of its [[Domain Slamming|domain slamming]] practices.<ref>[http://www.onlineverif.com/?go=pages/posts/posts&id=21064 Slamming Practices]</ref> A process wherein it collects important details about domain owners from the [[Whois]] data base and sends them e-mails, expiration letters or renewal notices, misleading domain owners and telling them to immediately renew their domain names through them. Unknowingly the owners are transferring their domain names to a different operator.  
ICANN received several complaints from customers as well as other domain registry operators because of its resellers advertising practices.<ref>[http://www.onlineverif.com/?go=pages/posts/posts&id=21064 Slamming Practices]</ref> A process wherein it collects important details about domain owners from the websites and sends them expiration notices, informing domain owners of their upcoming domain expiration, and giving them the opportunity to "transfer and renew" their domain names through them. If the domain owner chooses to "transfer and renew" with them, they are then subjected to ICANN's normal transfer procedures in order to successfully transfer the domain name from their current registrar to them.


In 2003, the United States [[FTC|Federal Trade Commission]] requested a federal district court to issue an injunction against Domain Registry of America (eNom, Inc.), one of the resellers under Brandon Gray Internet Services from making misrepresentations in selling its domain registry services. The FTC also asked the court to pay its 50,000 customers with redress and prohibit the company to engage in domain slamming practices and to put the company's activities under FTC's strict monitoring.<ref>[http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/12/domainreg.shtm FTC.gov]</ref>
Brandon Gray's resellers have presented their advertising material to both the Canadian Competition Bureau and the FTC to ensure compliance with local and federal advertising laws.  In both instances all the advertising material complied.
 
In 2003, the United States [[FTC|Federal Trade Commission]] requested a federal district court to issue an injunction against Domain Registry of America (eNom, Inc.), one of the resellers under Brandon Gray Internet Services, for making misrepresentations when selling its domain registry services. The FTC also asked the court to pay its 40,000 customers with a $4 redress for order cancellation fees.  Also, to prohibit the company to engage in domain slamming practices and to put the company's activities under FTC's strict monitoring.<ref>[http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/12/domainreg.shtm FTC.gov]</ref> to which it has complied with for over 11 years.


The '''UK Advertising Watchdog Authority''' also complained against the same domain slamming practices committed by [[Domain Registry of Europe]]. The organization threatened to file legal actions against DRoE if it continues to send bill-like renewal notices to domain owners in 2003. The company's argues,"notices were not a bill, rather an easy means of payment should you decide to register or renew your domain(s) with us".<ref>[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/08/06/legal_action_threatened_against_domain/ The Register.co.uk]</ref>
The '''UK Advertising Watchdog Authority''' also complained against the same domain slamming practices committed by [[Domain Registry of Europe]]. The organization threatened to file legal actions against DRoE if it continues to send bill-like renewal notices to domain owners in 2003. The company's argues,"notices were not a bill, rather an easy means of payment should you decide to register or renew your domain(s) with us".<ref>[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/08/06/legal_action_threatened_against_domain/ The Register.co.uk]</ref>


According to The Register's report, since 2001 the Canadian Competition Bureau already warned Canadian Businesses regarding invoice-like renewal notices from registry resellers particularly Domain Registry of Canada, a reseller under Brandon Gray Internet Services, Inc. The [[CIRA|Canadian Internet Registration Authority]], is the official administrator of the [[.ca]] domain name in Canada.
According to The Register's report, since 2001 the Canadian Competition Bureau already warned Canadian Businesses regarding invoice-like renewal notices from registry resellers particularly Internet Registry of Canada, an Enom reseller. The [[CIRA|Canadian Internet Registration Authority]], is the official administrator of the [[.ca]] domain name in Canada.
=== Individuals Involved===
 
 
Marilyn and Simon Benlolo, and other individuals with that surname are listed in a number of court documents related to the company.  


==Legal Battle==
==Legal Battle==
On September 10, 2010 Brandon Gray Internet Services' license to operate [[.ca]], the [[ccTLD|country code top-level domain]] name for Canada was terminated by [[CIRA]] because of the alleged domain registry slamming practices conducted by its reseller, the [[Domain Registry of Canada]].<ref>[http://www.itbusiness.ca/it/client/en/home/News.asp?id=59307 IT Business.ca]</ref>
On September 10, 2010 Brandon Gray Internet Services' license to operate [[.ca]], the [[ccTLD|country code top-level domain]] name for Canada was not renewed by [[CIRA]] because of the alleged domain registry slamming practices conducted by its reseller, the [[Domain Registry of Canada]].<ref>[http://www.itbusiness.ca/it/client/en/home/News.asp?id=59307 IT Business.ca]</ref>


Brandon Gray Internet Services Inc. argued that CIRA did not give them any reason regarding the termination of their license and because of that the company filed a $10 million suit for damages and breach of contract. Meanwhile, DROC claims that Brandon Gray has nothing to do with their reselling operations even if they share the same mailing address, phone system and extension links. [[David Burroughs]], DROC's senior executive claimed, "The nature of our business relationship to handle certain customer service related aspects of our respective businesses is a private matter. We are simply a reseller through them (Brandon Gray)".<ref>[http://www.itbusiness.ca/it/client/en/home/News.asp?id=59307 IT Business.ca]</ref>
Brandon Gray Internet Services Inc. argued that CIRA did not give them any reason regarding the non-renewal of their license and because of that the company filed a $10 million suit for damages and breach of contract. Meanwhile, DROC claims that Brandon Gray has nothing to do with their reselling operations even if they share the same mailing address, phone system and extension links. [[David Burroughs]], DROC's senior executive claimed, "The nature of our business relationship to handle certain customer service related aspects of our respective businesses is a private matter. We are simply a reseller through them (Brandon Gray)".<ref>[http://www.itbusiness.ca/it/client/en/home/News.asp?id=59307 IT Business.ca]</ref>


On January 27, 2011, the company's injunction request to maintain its license to operate the .ca ccTLD was dismissed by Justice Gilmore. However, she cited that CIRA did not give Brandon Gray the chance to explain its business relationship with DROC. Furthermore, the Judge said that the domain registrar may have complied to the CIRA's recertification regulations. In her ruling Gilmore wrote,“There is a serious issue to be tried in relation to whether or not CIRA breached its agreement with Brandon Gray,” she writes. It could be argued "CIRA does not have unfettered discretion to refuse Brandon Gray's application". <ref>[http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/020711_Registrar_Brandon_Gray_Internet_Services_Loses_License_to_Sell_CA_Domains Web Host Industry Review]</ref>
On January 27, 2011, the company's injunction request to maintain its license to operate the .ca ccTLD was dismissed by Justice Gilmore. However, she cited that CIRA did not give Brandon Gray the chance to explain its business relationship with DROC. Furthermore, the Judge said that the domain registrar may have complied to the CIRA's recertification regulations. In her ruling Gilmore wrote,“There is a serious issue to be tried in relation to whether or not CIRA breached its agreement with Brandon Gray,” she writes. It could be argued "CIRA does not have unfettered discretion to refuse Brandon Gray's application". <ref>[http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/020711_Registrar_Brandon_Gray_Internet_Services_Loses_License_to_Sell_CA_Domains Web Host Industry Review]</ref>


CIRA is set to fight Brandon Gray's $10 million suit for damages and breach of contract.
CIRA is set to fight Brandon Gray's $10 million suit for damages and breach of contract. The lawsuit filed by Brandon Gray was resolved in an out-of-court private settlement with an undisclosed amount paid to Brandon Gray by CIRA.
 
==ICANN Breach Notice==
On 16 December 2013, [[ICANN]] sent a breach-of-contract notice to Brandon Gray Internet Services for failing to “maintain and make available to ICANN registration records relating to dealings with the Registered Name Holder”of businesspotion.com." The company has until January 13th to provide ICANN with requested documentation or face losing its ICANN accreditation.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/15350-finally-domain-slamming-registrar-gets-icann-breach-notice Finally, Domain-Slamming Registrar gets ICANN Breach Notice, DomainIncite] Retrieved 30 Dec 2013</ref>
 
On 18 July 2014, [[ICANN]] sent a NOTICE OF SUSPENSION OF REGISTRAR’S ABILITY TO CREATE NEW REGISTERED NAMES OR INITIATE INBOUND TRANSFERS OF REGISTERED NAMES to Brandon Gray Internet Services. Pursuant to Section 5.5.6 of the RAA, Brandon Gray has been in fundamental and material breach of its obligations under the RAA at least three (3) times within a twelve (12) month period; on 16 December 2013, 19 March 2014, and 18 July 2014. Brandon Gray’s ability to create new Registered Names or initiate inbound transfers of Registered Names is suspended for 90 days pursuant to Section 5.7 of the RAA. The suspension is effective 12 August 2014 at 00:00
UTC and will conclude on 17 October 2014 at 00:00 UTC, or longer if Brandon Gray has not demonstrated compliance on or before 10 October 2014.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/serad-to-patel-2-18jul14-en.pdf ICANN Sends Notice of Suspension to Registrar] </ref>
 


==References==
==References==


{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/Brandon_Gray_Internet_Services_Inc."