4,183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 35:
Line 35: + + + + + + +
→String Confusion Objection
On August 27, 2013, the [[Google]] objection to the [[DERCars, LLC]] application was decided, with [[Google]] winning and the objection prevailing. It would be the only determination of the 3 objections that Google won, as the objection against [[Uniregistry]] failed on October 10, 2013.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/odr/determination Objection Determinations, ICANN.org] Retrieved 07 Nov 2013</ref>
On August 27, 2013, the [[Google]] objection to the [[DERCars, LLC]] application was decided, with [[Google]] winning and the objection prevailing. It would be the only determination of the 3 objections that Google won, as the objection against [[Uniregistry]] failed on October 10, 2013.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/odr/determination Objection Determinations, ICANN.org] Retrieved 07 Nov 2013</ref>
==Conflicting decisions and appeal==
On October 9th 2013, a panelist for a [[String Confusion Objection]] brought by Google against DERcars over the [[TLD]] .cars ruled in favor of Google. <ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2013/10/09/uh-oh-icann-will-be-forced-to-act-after-conflicting-cars-decisions/ ICANN to be forced to act after conflicting cars decisions] Domainnamewire, retrieved December 3rd 2014.</ref> This ruling meant that DERcars' application for .cars would be in the same contention set as Google's application for .car. Given that [[Donuts]] and [[Uniregistry]] also applied for .cars (and Google's objections to their applications were overruled), an arguable inconsistency had arisen.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2013/10/09/uh-oh-icann-will-be-forced-to-act-after-conflicting-cars-decisions/ ICANN to be forced to act after conflicting cars decisions] Domainnamewire, retrieved December 3rd 2014.</ref>
On February 12th 2014, ICANN announced that DERCars and United TLD (Rightside), which lost String Confusion Objection rulings for their .cars and .cam applications respectively, would have the right to appeal the 'inconsistent' rulings against them, and that they were the only parties with the right to do so.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/15797-icann-reveals-gtld-objections-appeals-process ICANN reveals appeals process for gTLD objections] Domainincite, retrieved 3rd December 2014.</ref>
==Private Auction==
==Private Auction==