After the AUC's 'Call for Expression of Interest in May of 2011, [[DCA]] responded to the open process negatively, stating that the actions of the AUC were not "transparent and accountable" and that their previous endorsement was still applicable. In response, the AUC stated that [[DCA]]'s continued persistence would create an "unwarranted and unecessary intrustion on the AUC's mandate." | After the AUC's 'Call for Expression of Interest in May of 2011, [[DCA]] responded to the open process negatively, stating that the actions of the AUC were not "transparent and accountable" and that their previous endorsement was still applicable. In response, the AUC stated that [[DCA]]'s continued persistence would create an "unwarranted and unecessary intrustion on the AUC's mandate." |