Talk:.gop: Difference between revisions
Loupgarous (talk | contribs) mentioned http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/dot-gop-domain-newest-and-one-funniest-internet-memes and asked for consensus on whether this is notable enough to mention in the article |
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/dot-gop-domain-newest-and-one-funniest-internet-memes is a page on that soi-disant "progressive" organization's Web site which lampooned the RNC's selling .gop addresses. Is this notable enough to include in the article [[.gop]]? [[User:Loupgarous|Loupgarous]] ([[User talk:Loupgarous|talk]]) 16:18, 17 October 2016 (PDT) | http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/dot-gop-domain-newest-and-one-funniest-internet-memes is a page on that soi-disant "progressive" organization's Web site which lampooned the RNC's selling .gop addresses. Is this notable enough to include in the article [[.gop]]? [[User:Loupgarous|Loupgarous]] ([[User talk:Loupgarous|talk]]) 16:18, 17 October 2016 (PDT) | ||
==Not notable enough to justify inclusion== | |||
Since this does not consider actual registrations, but rather an internet meme that effectively parodies the Republican party. I do not believe that it is newsorthy or notable enough to justify it's inclusion in the article, especially given the partisan nature of the article. Thanks for sharing though. [[User:Dustin Phillips|Dustin Phillips]] ([[User talk:Dustin Phillips|talk]]) 13:12, 23 October 2016 (PDT) | |||
:That's precisely why I asked. Different wikis have different criteria for notability, and even within wikipedia there can be wide differences of opinion. Thanks for your time [[User:Loupgarous|Loupgarous]] ([[User talk:Loupgarous|talk]]) 16:26, 23 October 2016 (PDT) | |||
:I certainly appreciate you asking and welcome your contributions to the community! [[User:Dustin Phillips|Dustin Phillips]] ([[User talk:Dustin Phillips|talk]]) 07:13, 24 October 2016 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:13, 24 October 2016
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/dot-gop-domain-newest-and-one-funniest-internet-memes is a page on that soi-disant "progressive" organization's Web site which lampooned the RNC's selling .gop addresses. Is this notable enough to include in the article .gop? Loupgarous (talk) 16:18, 17 October 2016 (PDT)
Not notable enough to justify inclusion
Since this does not consider actual registrations, but rather an internet meme that effectively parodies the Republican party. I do not believe that it is newsorthy or notable enough to justify it's inclusion in the article, especially given the partisan nature of the article. Thanks for sharing though. Dustin Phillips (talk) 13:12, 23 October 2016 (PDT)
- That's precisely why I asked. Different wikis have different criteria for notability, and even within wikipedia there can be wide differences of opinion. Thanks for your time Loupgarous (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2016 (PDT)
- I certainly appreciate you asking and welcome your contributions to the community! Dustin Phillips (talk) 07:13, 24 October 2016 (PDT)