User:Colby/Non-existent TLDs: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 16:13, 15 July 2024

While reviewing the availability of TLDs and the trends in new gTLD name selection, I've begun keeping a shortlist of those where I found myself at least mildly surprised and/or interested in the fact that they don't exist. Each represents a potential opportunity (some more tenuous than others). Here is the list so far:

cube
hole
lmno (compare .xyz)
moon (compare .earth)
pipe (compare .dev, .tech)
okay
stack
what

Hard to say, but I think "pipe" and "moon" are particularly ripe for market.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-While reviewing the availability of TLDs and the trends in new gTLD name selection, I've begun keeping a list of those where I found myself at least mildly surprised and/or interested in the fact that they don't exist.  Each represents a potential opportunity (some more tenuous than others).  Here is the list so far:
+While reviewing the availability of TLDs and the trends in new gTLD name selection, I've begun keeping a shortlist of those where I found myself at least mildly surprised and/or interested in the fact that they don't exist.  Each represents a potential opportunity (some more tenuous than others).  Here is the list so far:
 * [[.cube|cube]]
+* [[.hole|hole]]
 * [[.lmno|lmno]] (compare [[.xyz]])
 * [[.moon|moon]] (compare [[.earth]])
 * [[.pipe|pipe]] (compare [[.dev]], [[.tech]])
 * [[.okay|okay]]
+* [[.stack|stack]]
+* [[.what|what]]
-I consider "lmno" to be especially tenuous, for example—but I could be wrong and it might be the complete opposite.  Hard to say, but I think "pipe" and "moon" are particularly ripe for market.
+Hard to say, but I think "pipe" and "moon" are particularly ripe for market.