Difference between revisions of "Talk:Afternic"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "# Balanced discussion is good, but can you cite where the concern came from? # Can you cite the year and source for the 61 Mil in sales?") |
|||
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | '''Balanced discussion is good, but can you cite where the concern came from?'''<br/> | |
− | + | Alex: Done | |
+ | |||
+ | '''Can you cite the year and source for the 61 Mil in sales?'''<br/> | ||
+ | Alex: As the figure is for the parent company and I have been unable to find financial data that is seperate from the parent organization, I have removed that figure. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''founder(s)?'''<br/> | ||
+ | Alex: No data, unfortunately :( | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Please name citations (references)'''<br/> | ||
+ | Alex: Done | ||
+ | |||
+ | : That's great, thanks [[User:Ray|Ray]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===other=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | should we be linking to the sites in the title as is done here? [[User:Andrew|Andrew]] | ||
+ | : I think it's ok, but not necessary since a link to the site should be in the company infobox [[User:Ray|Ray]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | *also, a recent news section seems like it will date the site [[User:Andrew|Andrew]] | ||
+ | : Agree, if we have news it should be the highlights and important stuff, not just something that's just "recent" [[User:Ray|Ray]] |
Latest revision as of 16:53, 21 January 2011
Balanced discussion is good, but can you cite where the concern came from?
Alex: Done
Can you cite the year and source for the 61 Mil in sales?
Alex: As the figure is for the parent company and I have been unable to find financial data that is seperate from the parent organization, I have removed that figure.
founder(s)?
Alex: No data, unfortunately :(
Please name citations (references)
Alex: Done
- That's great, thanks Ray
other
should we be linking to the sites in the title as is done here? Andrew
- I think it's ok, but not necessary since a link to the site should be in the company infobox Ray
- also, a recent news section seems like it will date the site Andrew
- Agree, if we have news it should be the highlights and important stuff, not just something that's just "recent" Ray