ISPs and Connectivity Providers Constituency: Difference between revisions

The '''ISPs and Connectivity Providers Constituency''' '''(ISPCP)''' is part of the [[Commercial Stakeholder Group]] in the [[Non-Contracted Parties House]] under [[ICANN]]'s [[GNSO|Generic Name Supporting Organization]] (GNSO). Its primary role is to  fulfill roles and responsibilities set forth by the [[ICANN]] and GNSO Bylaws, rules, policies and activities. It was constituted by the [[ICANN Board]] on October 18, 1999.

The members of the ISPCP Constituency are entities that operate name servers to third parties or operators of internet backbone network based on [[TCP/IP]] and provide transit to either Internet users or third party Internet content. Internet service providers or connectivity networks may apply for membership with the constituency as long as they are able to demonstrate the activities of the [[GNSO]] impact their organization and show that they understand that the delegates appointed by the Constituency are expected to regularly participate in the Constituency's work, events and activities.<ref>[http://www.ispcp.info/abt-memb.html Membership]</ref> Currently, the ISPCP has 52 members which include Antel, [[British Telecom]], [[CSL Deutsche Telecom]], [[Asimelec]], [[CAIP]], [[ETNO]] among others.

* Reviews applications for membership in the ISPC

* Carries out the administrative functions related with ISPCP operations such as scheduling meetings and preparation and publication of minutes, maintains suitable ways to facilitate contact and disseminates information to its members regarding activities, events and other functions undertaken by the secretariat

* Facilitates and formulates membership consensus on policy issues to provide advise to the Names Council and other ICANN bodies

* Assesses and collects membership fees

===Members===

* [[Tony Holmes]], Deputy Chair, [[BT]] (UK)

* [[Wolf-Ulrich Knoben]], Chair & CSG Representative (Germany)

* [[Tony Harris]], GNSO Councilor, [[CABASE]] (Argentina)

* [[Philippe Fouquart]] –– EU

The Constituency regularly provides comments or statements on ICANN Policy Issues by building and gathering internal consensus among its members. ISPCP statements on ICANN Policy Issues include:

* The Constituency's response regarding the "Staff Report on the [[Whois]] Implementation", whereby the ISP community expressed their concern regarding the Operational Point of Contact ([[OPOC]]) proposal to reform the Whois. ISPCP pointed out that potential changes to the Whois will possibly hinder the activities and effective, efficient performance of the ISP community.<ref>[http://www.ispcp.info/stmt-whois2.pdf Statement on WHOis Staff Report]</ref>

* Comments to the [[DOC|US Department of Commerce]] on ICANN Contract Renewal wherein the Constituency expressed their continued support of ICANN. They believed that the guiding principles of ICANN's DNS management such as stability, competition, private sector participation, bottom-up coordination and multi-stakeholder representation are relevant and critical for the global Internet community. According to them, the recent re-organization of ICANN demonstrated progress and it was able to meet the goals set forth by the [[White Paper]]. ICANN satisfactorily met its primary tasks and milestones based on the [[MoU]] with the Department of Commerce. The Internet has grown rapidly and [[IANA]]'s services have improved and became more professional. Furthermore, the ISP community recommended the establishment of a new and clear timetable for ICANN"s systematic and orderly transition towards private sector management and they also emphasized that effective staffing of IANA and ICANN's [[ccTLD]] liaisons is important, and that they believed the focus on technology tools to address the root management is often over emphasized.<ref>[http://www.ispcp.info/stmt-doc.pdf Department of Commerce NTIA Docket 06051936-6136-01]</ref>

* Position on New [[gTLD]] Expansion- The Constituency emphasized that an informed discussion is required regarding new gTLDs and the establishment of guidelines for the implementation of new gTLDs.<ref>[http://www.ispcp.info/stmt-ntd.pdf ISPCP Position on New gTLD Expansion]</ref>