.mnet: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "internet" to "Internet" |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|translation = | |translation = | ||
|manager = | |manager = | ||
|registryprovider = | |registryprovider = [[Afilias]] | ||
|registrations = | |registrations = | ||
|date = | |date = | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
'''.mnet''' is a [[Brand TLD]] being proposed in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]]. The applicant is [[Electronic Media Network Limited]] (M-Net).<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings]</ref> | '''.mnet''' is a [[Brand TLD]] being proposed in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]]. The applicant is [[Electronic Media Network Limited]] (M-Net).<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings]</ref> | ||
==Application Details== | |||
The following is excerpted from the applicant's response to question #18: | |||
"The applicant, Electronic Media Network Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Multichoice South Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd. MultiChoice started as the subscriber management arm of M-Net, the analogue Pay-TV channel. Today it is the leading multichannel digital satellite television operator across the African continent. Its dynamic technology platform and varied bouquet of channels, built on a foundation of compelling premium entertainment, has seen MultiChoice grow its business across South Africa. | |||
We live in a world where information has become the key advantage. Today, information can travel anywhere, anytime, at great speed and in so many different ways - unlocking potential wherever it goes. MultiChoice constantly looks for innovative ways and push boundaries to deliver information and content that is not only entertaining, but informative. | |||
.. | |||
The proposed (.mnet) gTLD is a restricted, exclusively-controlled TLD that would serve the purpose of enhancing and expanding Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net)’s ability to: | |||
• deliver product and service marketing⁄advertising; | |||
• enable marketing campaign activation; | |||
• facilitate interaction and communication with individuals and entities with whom Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net) has a business relationship; | |||
• improve business operations; | |||
• simplify Internet user navigation to information about Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net) products and services; and | |||
• provide an online environment which instills trust and engenders confidence in Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net) and its affiliates."<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/368 Application Downloads, gTLDresult.ICANN.org]</ref> | |||
==String Confusion Objection== | |||
[[Verisign]] brought a [[String Confusion Objection]] against M-Net's application for .mnet, arguing that if M-Net were to change its business model in the future, it could cause confusion between .mnet and .net. Panelist Bruce Belding noted that .mnet would be targeted at consumers in South Africa, and that South African Internet users are unlikely to be confused by the coexistence of the two domain names; therefore he ruled against [[Verisign]]'s objection.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2013/12/10/verisign-loses-new-tld-objection-against-brand-applicant-m-net/ Verisign loses new TLD objection against brand applicant] Domainnamewire, retrieved 3rd December 2014.</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 18:34, 7 May 2024
| Status: | Proposed |
| Registry Provider: | Afilias |
| Type: | Brand TLD |
| Priority #: | 383 - Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net) |
More information: 
| |
.mnet is a Brand TLD being proposed in ICANN's New gTLD Program. The applicant is Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net).[1]
Application Details edit
The following is excerpted from the applicant's response to question #18:
"The applicant, Electronic Media Network Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Multichoice South Africa Holdings (Pty) Ltd. MultiChoice started as the subscriber management arm of M-Net, the analogue Pay-TV channel. Today it is the leading multichannel digital satellite television operator across the African continent. Its dynamic technology platform and varied bouquet of channels, built on a foundation of compelling premium entertainment, has seen MultiChoice grow its business across South Africa. We live in a world where information has become the key advantage. Today, information can travel anywhere, anytime, at great speed and in so many different ways - unlocking potential wherever it goes. MultiChoice constantly looks for innovative ways and push boundaries to deliver information and content that is not only entertaining, but informative.
..
The proposed (.mnet) gTLD is a restricted, exclusively-controlled TLD that would serve the purpose of enhancing and expanding Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net)’s ability to: • deliver product and service marketing⁄advertising; • enable marketing campaign activation; • facilitate interaction and communication with individuals and entities with whom Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net) has a business relationship; • improve business operations; • simplify Internet user navigation to information about Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net) products and services; and • provide an online environment which instills trust and engenders confidence in Electronic Media Network Limited (M-Net) and its affiliates."[2]
String Confusion Objection edit
Verisign brought a String Confusion Objection against M-Net's application for .mnet, arguing that if M-Net were to change its business model in the future, it could cause confusion between .mnet and .net. Panelist Bruce Belding noted that .mnet would be targeted at consumers in South Africa, and that South African Internet users are unlikely to be confused by the coexistence of the two domain names; therefore he ruled against Verisign's objection.[3]
References edit
- ↑ Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings
- ↑ Application Downloads, gTLDresult.ICANN.org
- ↑ Verisign loses new TLD objection against brand applicant Domainnamewire, retrieved 3rd December 2014.