.pay: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
# [[Amazon]] | # [[Amazon]] | ||
# [[DOTPAY SA]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Pay Status, ICANN.org]</ref> - In May 2013, it was revealed that DOTPAY SA's application for .pay failed [[initial evaluation]] due to the fact that it scored only 7 out of a necessary 8 on the financial questions. The applicant requested and passed in extended evaluation.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/13217-icann-reveals-81-passes-and-one-failure-in-latest-new-gtld-results-batch ICANN Reveals 81 Passes and One Failure in Latest New gTLD Results Batch, DomainIncite.com] Published and Retrieved May 31, 2013</ref> | # [[DOTPAY SA]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Pay Status, ICANN.org]</ref> - In May 2013, it was revealed that DOTPAY SA's application for .pay failed [[initial evaluation]] due to the fact that it scored only 7 out of a necessary 8 on the financial questions. The applicant requested and passed in extended evaluation.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/13217-icann-reveals-81-passes-and-one-failure-in-latest-new-gtld-results-batch ICANN Reveals 81 Passes and One Failure in Latest New gTLD Results Batch, DomainIncite.com] Published and Retrieved May 31, 2013</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 20:17, 7 November 2013
| Status: | Proposed |
| country: | International |
| Type: | Generic |
| Category: | Commerce |
More information: 
| |
.pay is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.
Applicants
- Amazon
- DOTPAY SA[1] - In May 2013, it was revealed that DOTPAY SA's application for .pay failed initial evaluation due to the fact that it scored only 7 out of a necessary 8 on the financial questions. The applicant requested and passed in extended evaluation.[2]
References
- ↑ Pay Status, ICANN.org
- ↑ ICANN Reveals 81 Passes and One Failure in Latest New gTLD Results Batch, DomainIncite.com Published and Retrieved May 31, 2013