14,932
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 82:
Line 82: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→ISPCPC
======ISPCPC======
======ISPCPC======
This session included a discussion on CSG priorities, namely:
*The BC wants the recommendations to lower DNS abuse to be connected with the trigger to open the next round of new gTLDs. The ISPCPC does not support tying the two.
*The factions of the CSG all agree that [[ATRT3]] recommendations must move forward.
*DNS abuse is straining the CSG as a collective as the three subgroups do not agree on the significance of mitigating it and continue to focus on how to define it.
[[Jeff Bedser]] from the [[SSAC]] explained [[SAC115]] to the audience.
He gave credit to [[Suzanne Wolf]] for coming up with and/or emphasizing the need to find an interoperable solution for DNS abuse despite the differences in layers. <br/> The proposed framework outlines:
# Points of responsibility
# Escalation paths in response to reporters sending complaints to the wrong point of responsibility
# Universal standards for evidence (types include: temporal, visual, behavioral, and demonstrative)
# Acceptable response timeframes
# Availability of quality contact info (not natural, legal) <br/>
The framework stays away from terms of criminality to avoid jurisdictional issues.
======IPC======
======IPC======
======NCSG======
======NCSG======