Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<div class="banner"> | <div class="banner"> | ||
[[File: | [[File:Review Overlap.jpeg|800px|center]]</div> | ||
<div style="clear:both;"></div> | <div style="clear:both;"></div> | ||
<div style="width:49.5%;float:left;"> | <div style="width:49.5%;float:left;"> | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="width:49.5%;float:right"> | <div style="width:49.5%;float:right"> | ||
<div style="background:#61A376; font-family:sans-serif;font-weight:bold;text-align:left;color:#F2EFEA;height: 1.5em;margin:.2em 0em .1em 0em; padding:.5em .25em .5em .75em;border-radius:5px;"> | <div style="background:#61A376; font-family:sans-serif;font-weight:bold;text-align:left;color:#F2EFEA;height: 1.5em;margin:.2em 0em .1em 0em; padding:.5em .25em .5em .75em;border-radius:5px;">[[ICANN Reviews]] and [[Third Accountability and Transparency Review|ATRT 3]]</div> | ||
<div style="width:97%;padding:.5em .5em .5em .5em;"> | <div style="width:97%;padding:.5em .5em .5em .5em;"> | ||
"Review fatigue" has been a persistent complaint within the ICANN Community. As our timeline graphic (above) shows, there have been very few points in ICANN's history when there were no reviews, or only one review, in progress. The [[Third Accountability and Transparency Review]] has addressed this review glut head on. Among other reforms, the ATRT 3 team made the following recommendations: | |||
* Convert organizational reviews to "continuous improvement processes" within each [[Supporting Organizations|SO]] & [[Advisory Committee|AC]]; | |||
* Utilize the feedback and findings of these continuous improvement processes, as well as annual meetings of the SOs and ACs, to inform a new, "holistic" review that engages with the ICANN organization as a whole; and | |||
* | * Reform or remove most of the [[ICANN Reviews#Specific Reviews|reviews required under Article 4.6]] of the ICANN Bylaws. | ||
These changes would represent a massive transformation to ICANN's review practices. The ICANN Board, while accepting the proposals in principle, has requested ICANN staff to develop plans for pilot programs for continuous improvement and the holistic review. The modifications to the Article 4.6 specific reviews, because they would require amending the Bylaws, are subject to community buy-in and support. | |||
</div> | </div> |