MEAC DNS Study: Difference between revisions
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
The region covered in the MEAC Study covers a large geographic expanse, from the Atlantic coast in the West to the Hindu Kush in the East. Linguistic diversity includes several languages sharing Arabic script, such as Arabic, Urdu, Farsi, Dari, Pashto), and others (such as Turkish) written in Latin script.<ref name="icann"></ref> | The region covered in the MEAC Study covers a large geographic expanse, from the Atlantic coast in the West to the Hindu Kush in the East. Linguistic diversity includes several languages sharing Arabic script, such as Arabic, Urdu, Farsi, Dari, Pashto), and others (such as Turkish) written in Latin script.<ref name="icann"></ref> | ||
At the request of [[ICANN]], the MEAC DNS Study focuses deeply on the following countries: Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Turkey, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates.<ref name="study"></ref> | At the request of [[ICANN]], the MEAC DNS Study focuses deeply on the following countries: Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Turkey, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates. The online population across the region varies greatly, from as low as 6% in Afghanistan) to 88% in United Arab Emirates.<ref name="study"></ref> | ||
====Economic Differences==== | ====Economic Differences==== | ||
Across all the economic measures, Gulf countries score most highly, Afghanistan consistently ranks lowest.<ref name="study"></ref> | Across all the economic measures, Gulf countries score most highly, Afghanistan consistently ranks lowest.<ref name="study"></ref> | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
|} | |} | ||
====Languages and Literacy Rates==== | ====Languages and Literacy Rates==== | ||
Literacy rates are essential for participation in internet usage. Countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan may face greater challenges in getting its population online than countries with higher literacy levels, such as Jordan and Lebanon.<ref name="study"></ref><ref name="worldbank">[http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD GDP per capita (current US$)], WorldBank.org. Retrieved 2015 November 7.</ref> | Literacy rates are essential for participation in internet usage. Countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan may face greater challenges in getting its population online than countries with higher literacy levels, such as Jordan and Lebanon.<ref name="study"></ref><ref name="worldbank">[http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD GDP per capita (current US$)], WorldBank.org. Retrieved 2015 November 7.</ref> | ||
Revision as of 21:30, 7 November 2015
The Middle East and Adjoining Countries (MEAC) DNS Study 2015 analyzes the MEAC region's domain name industry and registration data as it relates to the larger global internet environment. MEAC contains a structured survey of ccTLD registries in the region, supplemented with interviews with registries and registrars, and also offers suggested actions to stimulate wider uptake in the region.[1]
The recommendation to conduct this study was one of the outcomes of the Middle East Engagement Strategy, which was developed by a group of community members in the region, and defined three strategic focus areas for the region. One of those focus areas, which was to develop the region's domain name industry, is covered by this study.[2]
ICANN first called for proposals for the study in March 2015, and requested that reports be submitted no later than October 9th.[2] In June 2015, the .eu registry, EURid, was selected by ICANN to conduct the study.[3]
General Findings[edit | edit source]
Regional Differences[edit | edit source]
- Across the region as a whole, 31% of users spend 3 hours or fewer per day online, but in some countries, people said they are online for more than 10 hours per day.
- Users have a strong preference for websites using local languages such as Arabic, Farsi, and Urdu when interacting with friends and government online, but English dominates the language of web content, with 71% of sites associated with the region (compared to 55% of global sites).[1]
- Social media is on the uptake in the region, perhaps because difficulties in domain name registration make social media a faster channel to get online.[1]
Domain Name Industry[edit | edit source]
- Only 1% of the world's registered domains are in the MEAC region. Only 3 ccTLDs in the region have higher than 10 domains per 1,000 inhabitants, which compares to 100-300 domains per 1,000 in other countries worldwide.[1]
- Annual growth in domain name registrations is strong, at >20% per year. Growth is particularly strong in ccTLDs that have deregulated, such as .tn and .ma.
- There are 21,000 IDNs in the region, half of which are under .tr and half which are Arabic script -- but in general, uptake of IDNs is hampered by lack of universal acceptance.[1]
- Hosting markets are strongly linked to domain name registration, and hosting across the region is weak, with the exception of Iran and Turkey. Only 5% of popular web content is hosted in the region, and many countries have strict legislation affecting internet content.[1]
- Most international registrars who have modern platforms for end-users are not present in the region and are discouraged from involvement due to administrative barriers to registering domain names in the region, such as manual procedures or pre-registration checks.[1]
- Most ccTLDs in the region are confined to their territory and have strict policies for registrar accreditation and domain name registration.[1]
- End user awareness about internet domain names was quite high; nearly half the users surveyed knew what a domain name is. 40% typed domains directly into the navigation bar of their browser (compared with 35 % of global users), and nearly all users from the region check the domain name before clicking search results.[1]
Recommendations[edit | edit source]
- Basic internet access issues need to be given priority. Local hosting markets must be strengthened.
- Policies and investment should focus on supporting eCommerce and local language content.
- Local TLD operators should liberalize policies, by making them more accessible, lowering fees, and making policies more transparent.[1]
- Standarizing technical and operational systems will reduce coasts and encourage international registrars to support the region, which is essential to long-term growth.
- International registrars can intensify local competition by lowering retail prices and improving uptake.
- ccTLDs in the region should consider starter programmes and incentives to on-board new registrars at local level.
- Registries may also consider bundling domain names with add-on products such as forwarding services and services that assist customers in building websites.[1]
MEAC Countries and the Socioeconomic Environment[edit | edit source]
The region covered in the MEAC Study covers a large geographic expanse, from the Atlantic coast in the West to the Hindu Kush in the East. Linguistic diversity includes several languages sharing Arabic script, such as Arabic, Urdu, Farsi, Dari, Pashto), and others (such as Turkish) written in Latin script.[2]
At the request of ICANN, the MEAC DNS Study focuses deeply on the following countries: Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Turkey, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates. The online population across the region varies greatly, from as low as 6% in Afghanistan) to 88% in United Arab Emirates.[1]
Economic Differences[edit | edit source]
Across all the economic measures, Gulf countries score most highly, Afghanistan consistently ranks lowest.[1]
| GDP per capita range | Countries or territories |
|---|---|
| < $999 (lowest) | Afghanistan |
| $ 1,000-$3,999 (lower middle) | Egypt, Morocco, Pakistan |
| $ 4,000-$19,999 (upper middle) | Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Tunisia, Turkey |
| > $20,000 (high) | Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates |
Languages and Literacy Rates[edit | edit source]
Literacy rates are essential for participation in internet usage. Countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan may face greater challenges in getting its population online than countries with higher literacy levels, such as Jordan and Lebanon.[1][4]
| Literacy (secondary+) | Country |
|---|---|
| 0-33% (low ranking) | Afghanistan |
| 34-65% | Pakistan |
| 66-89% | Iran, Jordan, Lebanon, Tunisia, Turkey |
| 90% + (high ranking) | Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey |
Linguistic and Cultural Homogeneity[edit | edit source]
High linguistic and cultural homogeneity result in high instances of local language web content, which in turn is a good marker of local domain name uptake in associated countries. It can be projected that countries like Egypt, Iran, Jordan, Morocco, and Turkey will thrive in local internet content growth more than countries with a more diverse population base and high percentage of migrant workers, such as UAE or Qatar. Possible distorting factors, however, include international sanctions or local laws which bar local applications from being available.[1]
Linguistic homogeneity is defined by the percentage of population speaking national language at home, according to statistics queried from Ethnologue,[5] and cultural homogeneity comes from UNESCO's 2009 World Report on Cultural Diversity 2009.[6]
| Country | Linguistic Homogeneity | Cultural Homogeneity | Local Language Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Egypt | High | High | 60% |
| Iran | High | Medium | 80% |
| Morocco | High | High | 60% |
| Turkey | High | High | 65% |
| Saudi Arabia | Medium | Medium | 45% |
| Pakistan | Medium | Low | 35% |
| Afghanistan | -- | Medium | 30% |
| United Arab Emirates | Low | Low | 15% |
| Qatar | Low | Low | 20% |
Internet Access & Usage[edit | edit source]
Research Methodology[edit | edit source]
The data presented in the MEAC DNS Study was gathered from a combination of:[1]
- A specially-commissioned multi-country user survey
- Direct contact with ccTLD registries and registrars
- Data analysis of gTLD open zone files
Multi-Country User Survey[edit | edit source]
The users surveys were conducted in English, French, and Arabic, through a mixture of online forms and telephone interviews, and were administered by local companies and partners. 702 respondents in the MEAC region answered 24 questions on the user of online payment systems, online activities, and preferred languages. Though the sample size was large enough to draw tentative conclusions across the region as a whole, the small number of individuals per country does potentially distort results, as large shifts in percentage may come from relatively small movements of numbers.[1]
ccTLD Registries and Registrars[edit | edit source]
ccTLDs in countries like Iran, Morocco, and Tunisia publicly publish their registration data, yet many of their statistics have only figures on the day consulted and lack historic or IDN data. Other registries in the region do not publish any statistics. Therefore, the MEAC DNS Study team, used existing resources and contacts from their ten-plus years of work in the ccTLD and IDN space. This included a long-term project called the EURid-UNESCO World Report on Internationalised Domain Names, as well as work with organizations like CENTR, LACTLD and APTLD. Therefore, the MEAC DNS Study benefit from these contacts; all ccTLD registration data in the study, including IDN data, either results from direct registry contact between June and September 2015, or from publicly available information from registry websites.[1]
gTLD Open Zone Files[edit | edit source]
Entire Data Set
All gTLD and open zone file domains were captured in June 2015, producing about 156 million entries. For privacy purposes, the team avoided doing large-scale WHOIS lookups, and supplemented them only when unavoidable. They recorded the following metrics for each domain name:[1]
- IP address of the domain name
- Web page status code for the domain
- Script of the domain name itself
- Scripts contained in the web page for the domain where content exists in the web page status code for the domain
- Geographical location of hosting for each domain name using the IP address and a lookup database - recording country, region and city for each
Identifying privacy/proxy registrations in the region was a large challenge, because hosting and registrant data are not guaranteed to be region-based. The team worked from a list of 500 popular websites and identified 4,832 unique domain names. They then gathered data through Alexa.com, performing WHOIS lookups to identify use of privacy proxy, country of hosting, website status and registrar of record. [1]
Regional Subset
For any domains that match one or more of the following criteria, a regional subset was produced:[1]
- Country of hosting the webpage was within the region
- The script of the domain name itself contains Arabic characters
- The content of the webpage contained Arabic characters
Arabic Subset
Many domains encountered in the subset produced only contained a small number of Arabic characters, so a further subset was created with those domains where at least 50 Arabic characters occurred on the webpage. These domains were checked to see if their HTML language attributes were set for one of the regional languages.[1]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 MEAC DNS Study, ICANN.org. Published 2015 October 13. Retrieved 2015 November 6.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Request for Proposal: DNS Study for the Middle East and Adjoining Countries, ICANN.org. Retrieved 2015 November 6.
- ↑ EURid selected by ICANN to develop DNS study in the Middle East and adjoining countries, EURid.org. Published 2015 June 15. Retrieved 2015 November 6.
- ↑ GDP per capita (current US$), WorldBank.org. Retrieved 2015 November 7.
- ↑ Ethnologue, Ethnologue.com. Retrieved 2015 November 7.
- ↑ Investing in Cultural Diversity and Intercultural Dialogue, UNESCO.org. Published 2009. Retrieved 2015 November 7.
External Links[edit | edit source]
- MEAC DNS Study - Draft Report, ICANN.org.
- MEAC DNS Study - Infographics, ICANN.org.