GDPR AND WHOIS: Difference between revisions
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
|Tech City | |Tech City | ||
|Do not display | |Do not display | ||
|- | |||
|Tech State/Province | |Tech State/Province | ||
|Do not display | |Do not display | ||
Line 76: | Line 77: | ||
|Anonymized email or web form | |Anonymized email or web form | ||
|- | |- | ||
Name Server | |Name Server | ||
Display | |Display | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Name Server | |Name Server | ||
Display | |Display | ||
|- | |- | ||
DNSSEC | |DNSSEC | ||
Display | |Display | ||
|- | |- | ||
DNSSEC | |DNSSEC | ||
Display | |Display | ||
|- | |- | ||
URL of ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form | |URL of ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form | ||
Display | |Display | ||
|- | |- | ||
>>> Last update of WHOIS database | |>>> Last update of WHOIS database | ||
Display | |Display | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Accreditation Model=== | ===Accreditation Model=== | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 16:48, 9 April 2018
GDPR and WHOIS[edit | edit source]
The GDPR directly impacts the domain name system, most notability the WHOIS service and data that is collected, escrowed, transferred and displayed via public WHOIS by ICANN's contracted parties (Registries and Registrars). In light of the uncertainty around the implications of GDPR on WHOIS, ICANN announced in February 2018 that it would defer action against registries and registrars for noncompliance related to registration data, as long as it shares its model with ICANN Contractual Compliance and the Global Domains Division.[1]
Processes[edit | edit source]
GDPR enforcement beings 25 May 2018 and there are several processes underway that are either impacted by or in response to the EU Regulation.
Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace WHOIS (Next-Gen RDS) PDP[edit | edit source]
The Next Generation gTLD RDS to Replace WHOIS PDP Working Group was formed in November 2015 to define the purpose of collecting, maintaining and providing access to gTLD registration data, and to consider safeguards for protecting data, using the recommendations in the EWG's Final Report as an input to, and, if appropriate, as the foundation for a new gTLD policy.
The "Cookbook"[edit | edit source]
On 8 March 2018, the ICANN Organization released its "Interim Model for Compliance with ICANN Agreements and Policies in Relation to the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation,"[2] (or The Cookbook) including a description of the interim model, as well as explanation and rationale for its plan. The Cookbook also provides open question about several elements, seeking guidance from the community and DPAs.[3]
Calzone Model[edit | edit source]
Admin State/Province | Do not display |
Admin Postal Code | Do not display |
Admin Country | Do not display |
Admin Phone | Do not display |
Admin Phone Ext | Do not display |
Admin Fax | Do not display |
Admin Fax Ext | Do not display |
Admin Email | Anonymized email or web form |
Registry Tech ID | Do not display |
Tech Name | Do not display |
Tech Organization | Do not display |
Tech Street | Do not display |
Tech City | Do not display |
Tech State/Province | Do not display |
Tech Postal Code | Do not display |
Tech Country | Do not display |
Tech Phone | Do not display |
Tech Phone Ext | Do not display |
Tech Fax | Do not display |
Tech Fax Ext | Do not display |
Tech Email | Anonymized email or web form |
Name Server | Display |
Name Server | Display |
DNSSEC | Display |
DNSSEC | Display |
URL of ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form | Display |
>>> Last update of WHOIS database | Display |
Accreditation Model[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ ICANN Contractual Compliance Statement Accessed 2 February 2018
- ↑ Data Protection/Privacy Issues: ICANN61 Wrap-up and Next Steps
- ↑ [1]