.web: Difference between revisions
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
# '''[[Donuts]]''' (Ruby Glen, LLC) | # '''[[Donuts]]''' (Ruby Glen, LLC) | ||
==Current Applications== | ==Current Applications== |
Revision as of 15:06, 28 July 2016
Status: | Proposed |
country: | International |
Type: | Generic TLD |
Category: | Technology |
More information: |
.web is a proposed new generic top level domain name (gTLD) to ICANN's new gTLD expansion program. On 28 July 2016, the string was sold at an ICANN auction of last resort for a record-breaking $135 million.[1]
Applicants[edit | edit source]
- Web.com
- Radix (Web.com Group, Inc.)
- STRAAT Investments (NU DOT CO LLC)
- Schlund Technologies GmbH
- Afilias (Afilias Domains No. 3 Limited,)
- Google (Charleston Road Registry Inc.)
- Donuts (Ruby Glen, LLC)
Current Applications[edit | edit source]
Web.com[edit | edit source]
Some have said that Web.com has a strong case through the Legal Rights Objection because it owns the Web.com trademark. In a statement, Web.com CEO David Brown said, "We believe we possess the natural platform from which to successfully market the new .WEB top level domain since we are the sole owner of the Web.com trademark as issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark office." [2] Brown also conveyed that he is open to a cooperative arrangement between more than one applicant, and that Web.com would be satisfied regardless of who wins the application.[3]
Radix's Early Warning[edit | edit source]
Radix received a GAC Early Warning as an entire applicant, where each one of the applicants was flagged by the U.S. Government. This seems to be the only time a portfolio applicant had all of their applications warned. The issue does not deal with the technical capabilities or thematic content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation. It seems that Radix included correspondence with this address as a recommendation with each of their applications.[4]
Previous .web Applications & Current Contention[edit | edit source]
Image Online Design[edit | edit source]
.web was applied for in the 2000 first round of TLD expansion by Image Online Design. ICANN did not approve the application at that time, but IOD argues that it never officially rejected its application. Thus, in October 2012, IOD sued ICANN for breach of contract and trademark infringement. It is seeking an injunction to prevent ICANN from awarding the TLD to any of the current 2012 applicants, which does not include IOD, and also for profits from the alleged trademark infringement. The original application for .web was denied in part because IOD was already operating an alternative root using that TLD. They claim to still have 20,000 domains registered in their alternate root.[5]
On February 7th 2013, The United States District Court for the Central District of California approved a motion to dismiss the complaint from ICANN.[6]
Name Collision Issues[edit | edit source]
In October 2013 ICANN released their final assessment and mitigation plan for the Name Collision issue that was facing the New gTLD program. On 18 November 2013, ICANN announced the applied-for strings that were eligible for an alternative path towards delegation that would allow applicants to proceed without waiting for further mitigation research and plans to be published. 25 strings, including .web, were not eligible for the alternative path, and will have to wait for more plans to be published before continuing towards delegation.[7]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ .Web top level domain name auction ends for $135 million
- ↑ As new gTLDs enter a new phase, the first wave of announcements crashes
- ↑ Web.com CEO Talks Defensive .Web Strategy, Domain Incite Retrieved 11 Sept 2013
- ↑ RadixReg. GACweb.ICANN.org Retrieved 27 Nov 2012
- ↑ Original Web gTLD Applicant Sues ICANN, DomainIncite.com
- ↑ IOD v ICANN, ICANN.orgPublished and Retrieved 7 Feb 2013
- ↑ Announcement 17 Nov 13, ICANN.org Retrieved 20 Feb 2014