Jump to content

Second GNSO Organizational Review: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
JP (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197 edits
No edit summary
JP (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197 edits
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


==Initiation and RFP==
==Initiation and RFP==
Although the GNSO2 dashboard indicates that the review process was launched in January 2014, the first substantive documentation of the review comes from [[ICANN 49]] in Singapore, when Ray Plzak of the SIC gave a presentation<ref>[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48345814/GNSO%20Review%202014%20-%20Singapore%20Presentation.pdf Presentation Slides - GNSO Review], March 22, 2014</ref> to a working session of the GNSO regarding the upcoming review.<ref>[http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/sat-gnso-working/transcript-gnso-review-22mar14-en.pdf Transcript of Working Session - GNSO Review], March 22, 2014</ref> In April 2014, ICANN posted its RFP for an independent examiner to conduct the review.<ref name="rfp">[https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/request-for-proposal-for-review-of-generic-names-supporting-organization-gnso-23-4-2014-en ICANN.org Announcement - Request for Proposals, GNSO2], April 23, 2014</ref> The RFP included submission guidelines and documents for vendors to use in submitting their proposals.<ref name="rfp" />
Although the GNSO2 dashboard indicates that the review process was launched in January 2014, the first substantive documentation of the review comes from [[ICANN 49]] in Singapore, when [[Ray Plzak]] of the SIC gave a presentation<ref>[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48345814/GNSO%20Review%202014%20-%20Singapore%20Presentation.pdf Presentation Slides - GNSO Review Working Session], March 22, 2014</ref> to a working session of the GNSO regarding the upcoming review.<ref "49session">[http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/sat-gnso-working/transcript-gnso-review-22mar14-en.pdf Transcript of Working Session - GNSO Review], March 22, 2014</ref> Notably, Plzak emphasized that the review would take the first question - whether the GNSO should continue to exist - as a given.<ref name="49session" />
 
In April 2014, ICANN posted its RFP for an independent examiner to conduct the review.<ref name="rfp">[https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/request-for-proposal-for-review-of-generic-names-supporting-organization-gnso-23-4-2014-en ICANN.org Announcement - Request for Proposals, GNSO2], April 23, 2014</ref> The RFP included submission guidelines and documents for vendors to use in submitting their proposals.<ref name="rfp" /> The SIC then hosted a webinar on May 7, 2014, discussing the intent and scope of the GNSO2 review.<ref name="webinar">[https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/webinar-briefing-about-the-upcoming-review-of-the-generic-names-supporting-organization-gnso-23-4-2014-en ICANN.org Announcement - Webinar Briefing about GNSO2], April 23, 2014 (recordings available)</ref> The briefing outlined the same scope that Ray Plzak presented at the March working session. [[Avri Doria]] asked during the webinar if the Terms of Reference for the review had been shared or workshopped with the GNSO community. The response was that the working session at ICANN 49 "shared" the scope of the review.<ref name="webinar" />
 
===360 Assessment===
GNSO2 was notable for the addition of a "360-degree Assessment" of the GNSO's activity and effectiveness.<ref name="webslides">[http://www.icann.org/en/about/learning/webinars/gnso-review-07may14-en.pdf GNSO2 Webinar Slides], May 7, 2014 (PDF)</ref> This was intended to focus on GNSO Council members and other stakeholders to provide a self-assessment of the GNSO's effectiveness. It appears that this was intended to limit the number and breadth of interviews required to gather information for the independent examiner.<ref name="webinar" />
 
===Proposed Timeline===
At the webinar, staff presented a timeline that anticipated the final report by February 2015, with implementation of improvements beginning in the spring of 2015. The process of budgeting for and launching improvements was anticipated to take a year, with feedback and refinement of improvements continuing through 2018.<ref name="webslides" /> The review cycle anticipated an effectiveness self-assessment in 2018, to prepare for the next Article 4.4 review.<ref name="webslides" />
 
==Independent Examiner Findings and Recommendations==
[[Westlake Governance Ltd]] was selected to perform the GNSO2 assessment.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/westlake-governance-appointed-to-conduct-independent-review-of-the-gnso-23-6-2014-en ICANN.org Announcement - Westlake Governance Appointed to Conduct GNSO2 Review], June 23, 2014</ref> The Westlake team took a year to conduct the review, submitting its draft report in May 2015<ref name="dashboard" />
 
===Methodology===
 
 


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 16:13, 19 June 2021

The Second GNSO Organizational Review (GNSO2) was initiated in 2014 and completed in 2016, with the implementation of improvements continuing through January 2019.[1]

Background[edit | edit source]

Article 4.4 of the ICANN Bylaws requires periodic review of all supporting organizations and advisory committees, as well as the Nominating Committee.[2] The bylaws state three objectives for the review:

  1. to determine whether that organization, council or committee has a continuing purpose in the ICANN structure;
  2. if so, whether any change in structure or operations is desirable to improve its effectiveness; and
  3. whether that organization, council or committee is accountable to its constituencies, stakeholder groups, organizations and other stakeholders.[2]

The First GNSO Organizational Review, initiated in 2008, was a substantial and far-reaching undertaking that included the development of the two-house structure of the GNSO Council. Implementation of improvements from GNSO1 extended into the middle of 2012. This led the Structural Improvements Committee (as it was then known) to seek public comment on a proposal to defer GNSO2.[3] The proposal received eight comments,[4] seven of which were strongly in favor of initiating the review as soon as possible.[5] Some commenters noted that the independent examiner's assessment of the GNSO dated to 2006, with prior reviews of the GNSO Council (as well as the GNSO Council's self-assessment) being performed even earlier.[5] Upon review of the comments, the SIC determined that it should propose a start date of 2014 to the ICANN Board.[6] At its regular meeting on September 28, 2013, the board passed a resolution instructing the SIC to initiate GNSO2: "Resolved (2013.09.28.09), that the Board directs the SIC to schedule the review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO), which is mandated by ICANN Bylaws Article IV, Section 4, to commence in 2014, and that preparations for this Review commence as soon as feasible."[7]

Initiation and RFP[edit | edit source]

Although the GNSO2 dashboard indicates that the review process was launched in January 2014, the first substantive documentation of the review comes from ICANN 49 in Singapore, when Ray Plzak of the SIC gave a presentation[8] to a working session of the GNSO regarding the upcoming review.[9] Notably, Plzak emphasized that the review would take the first question - whether the GNSO should continue to exist - as a given.[10]

In April 2014, ICANN posted its RFP for an independent examiner to conduct the review.[11] The RFP included submission guidelines and documents for vendors to use in submitting their proposals.[11] The SIC then hosted a webinar on May 7, 2014, discussing the intent and scope of the GNSO2 review.[12] The briefing outlined the same scope that Ray Plzak presented at the March working session. Avri Doria asked during the webinar if the Terms of Reference for the review had been shared or workshopped with the GNSO community. The response was that the working session at ICANN 49 "shared" the scope of the review.[12]

360 Assessment[edit | edit source]

GNSO2 was notable for the addition of a "360-degree Assessment" of the GNSO's activity and effectiveness.[13] This was intended to focus on GNSO Council members and other stakeholders to provide a self-assessment of the GNSO's effectiveness. It appears that this was intended to limit the number and breadth of interviews required to gather information for the independent examiner.[12]

Proposed Timeline[edit | edit source]

At the webinar, staff presented a timeline that anticipated the final report by February 2015, with implementation of improvements beginning in the spring of 2015. The process of budgeting for and launching improvements was anticipated to take a year, with feedback and refinement of improvements continuing through 2018.[13] The review cycle anticipated an effectiveness self-assessment in 2018, to prepare for the next Article 4.4 review.[13]

Independent Examiner Findings and Recommendations[edit | edit source]

Westlake Governance Ltd was selected to perform the GNSO2 assessment.[14] The Westlake team took a year to conduct the review, submitting its draft report in May 2015[1]

Methodology[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 ICANN.org - GNSO Organizational Review Dashboard
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 ICANN Bylaws - Article 4.4
  3. ↑ ICANN.org Announcement - Potential Postponement of the GNSO Review, July 15, 2013
  4. ↑ ICANN.org - Public Comment Proceeding: Potential Postponement of the GNSO Review, posted July 15, 2013, comment period extended to September 6, 2013]
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Staff Report on Public Comment Proceeding, GNSO Review, September 2013
  6. ↑ Minutes of the Meeting of the Structural Improvements Committee, September 27, 2013
  7. ↑ Resolution of the Board, September 28 2013
  8. ↑ Presentation Slides - GNSO Review Working Session, March 22, 2014
  9. ↑ Transcript of Working Session - GNSO Review, March 22, 2014
  10. ↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named 49session
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 ICANN.org Announcement - Request for Proposals, GNSO2, April 23, 2014
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 ICANN.org Announcement - Webinar Briefing about GNSO2, April 23, 2014 (recordings available)
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 GNSO2 Webinar Slides, May 7, 2014 (PDF)
  14. ↑ ICANN.org Announcement - Westlake Governance Appointed to Conduct GNSO2 Review, June 23, 2014

Generic Names Supporting Organization. Develops and recommends to the Board substantive policies relating to generic top-level domains and other responsibilities set forth in the Bylaws (ICANN Bylaws).

Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/index.php?title=Second_GNSO_Organizational_Review&oldid=1320831"