Third Accountability and Transparency Review: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
* Replace all Specific Reviews with one review and all Organizational Reviews with one review; or | * Replace all Specific Reviews with one review and all Organizational Reviews with one review; or | ||
* Replace all Specific Reviews and all Organizational Reviews with one review.<ref name="caucusvid" /> | * Replace all Specific Reviews and all Organizational Reviews with one review.<ref name="caucusvid" /> | ||
The proposals generated conversation among board members and review team members regarding how best to implement the reforms required for each option.<ref name="caucusvid" /> The review team also had provisional proposals regarding diversity and representation, public comment issues, and other issue areas identified in the draft report. There was fruitful conversation about each of those issues.<ref name="caucusvid" /> | |||
On the same day, ATRT3 presented an update on its progress to the GAC.<ref>[https://66.schedule.icann.org/meetings/CT8ZfAtEnBF8tpsZq ICANN 66 Archive - GAC Plenary: Human Rights issues and ATRT3 Update], November 6, 2019</ref> The meeting included a similar presentation of findings and provisional recommendations related to the "GAC Interaction" work track.<ref name="gactranscript" />[https://cdn.filestackcontent.com/content=t:attachment,f:%22I66YUL_Wed06Nov2019-Accountability%20Transparency%20Review%20Team%20(ATRT)%203%20Update-en.pdf ICANN 66 Archive - Transcript of ATRT3 Update at GAC Plenary], November 6, 2019</ref> | |||
Finally, the review team held an engagement session for the general community.<ref>[https://66.schedule.icann.org/meetings/hYLNP4nyjRKrA5aSJ ICANN 66 Archive - Engagement Session with the ATRT3 Review Team], November 7, 2019</ref> The presentation focused on the five topic areas, and elaborated on the review team's impressions regarding specific and organziational reviews.<ref name="engagevid">[https://icann.zoom.us/recording/share/RDv_sYU2P9uX9_RWF1tGsDuplirHMrzyrqMgfWraJNqwIumekTziMw?startTime=1573151412000 ICANN 66 Archive - Video Recording of Engagement Session with ATRT3], November 7, 2019</ref> The team suggested that multiple factors may be present in the near-universal dissatisfaction with organizational reviews, and the less intense, but still substantial dissatisfaction with specific reviews: | |||
* Lack of coordination and overlap areas under review by different teams, sometimes resulting in conflicting recommendations; | |||
* Too many reviews in total, and too many reviews going on at once; | |||
* Competition for ICANN resources at the recommendation & implementation phase; | |||
* Lack of time or resources to effectively conduct the reviews; | |||
* Failure to properly implement some recommendations and report such implementation failures; and | |||
* Structural and bylaws-specific obstacles to having a systemic and holistic viewpoint<ref name="engagevid" /> | |||
===Draft Report=== | ===Draft Report=== | ||