Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 216: | Line 216: | ||
* The reviewing of the Cooperative Engagement Process (CEP) was merged with the Independent Review Process – Implementation Oversight Team (IRP-IOT) in June 2017. | * The reviewing of the Cooperative Engagement Process (CEP) was merged with the Independent Review Process – Implementation Oversight Team (IRP-IOT) in June 2017. | ||
===SO/AC Accountability=== | ===SO/AC Accountability=== | ||
* Every SO/AC/Group should document and publish its processes, guidelines, and decisions on its webpage. They should make the rules of eligibility and criteria for membership should be outlined and shared. SO/AC/Groups should consider term limits.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-24jun18-en.pdf CCWG-ACCT Final Report pgs. 275-276]</ref> | |||
===Staff Accountability=== | ===Staff Accountability=== | ||
===Transparency=== | ===Transparency=== | ||
ICANN should | |||
# improve its Documentary Information Disclosure Policy (DIDP) | |||
# document and report on its interactions with governments | |||
# improve the transparency of Board deliberations | |||
# improve ICANN’s Anonymous Hotline (Whistleblower Protection)<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-24jun18-en.pdf CCWG-ACCT Final Report pgs. 348-351]</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:Cross-Community Working Groups]] | [[Category:Cross-Community Working Groups]] |