Policy Development Process for New gTLD Subsequent Procedures: Difference between revisions
| Line 193: | Line 193: | ||
| Affirm and continue the baseline standard & visual criteria from 2012; increase clarity on the evaluation of similarity of singular/plural versions of strings, which led to some unpredictability and confusion in 2012; set a deadline for string confusion objections | | Affirm and continue the baseline standard & visual criteria from 2012; increase clarity on the evaluation of similarity of singular/plural versions of strings, which led to some unpredictability and confusion in 2012; set a deadline for string confusion objections | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 25 - [[Internationalized Domain Names]] | | 25 - [[IDN|Internationalized Domain Names]] | ||
| Allowed IDN applications and required consistency with root zone label generation rules | | Allowed IDN applications and required consistency with root zone label generation rules | ||
| Affirm and continue the processing of IDN applications and the use of RZ-LGR; consider the use of single-character TLDs in cases where the character is an ideogram or ideograph; allow IDN variant TLDs for existing or applied-for strings only if the strings are applied for / operated by the same registry. | | Affirm and continue the processing of IDN applications and the use of RZ-LGR; consider the use of single-character TLDs in cases where the character is an ideogram or ideograph; allow IDN variant TLDs for existing or applied-for strings only if the strings are applied for / operated by the same registry. | ||