Jump to content

FairWinds Partners: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Jessica (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jessica (talk | contribs)
m added Category:Sponsor using HotCat
 
Line 25: Line 25:
FairWinds Partners submitted 134 applications to [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]] on behalf of its clients. The company also applied for the [[Brand TLD]] [[.fairwinds]].<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus New gTLD Current Application Status, icann.org]</ref> They are the organizers behind a nonprofit organization and Domain Name conference [[Beyond The Dot]].<ref>[http://beyondthedotfoundation.org/ Beyond The Dot Foundation.org]</ref>  
FairWinds Partners submitted 134 applications to [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]] on behalf of its clients. The company also applied for the [[Brand TLD]] [[.fairwinds]].<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus New gTLD Current Application Status, icann.org]</ref> They are the organizers behind a nonprofit organization and Domain Name conference [[Beyond The Dot]].<ref>[http://beyondthedotfoundation.org/ Beyond The Dot Foundation.org]</ref>  


Joshua Bourne and Phil Lodico, also co-founded the [[Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse]] (CADNA),<ref>[http://icannwiki.com/CADNA]</ref>.
Joshua Bourne and Phil Lodico also co-founded the [[Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse]] (CADNA).<ref>[http://icannwiki.com/CADNA]</ref>


==Services==
==Services==
Line 31: Line 31:


* Domain Name Strategy and Advisory
* Domain Name Strategy and Advisory
* gTLD Strategy: Top Level Solutions
* gTLD Strategy: Top-Level Solutions
* S.M.A.R.T. gTLD Service
* S.M.A.R.T. gTLD Service
* New gTLD Brand Protection and Trademark Services
* New gTLD Brand Protection and Trademark Services
Line 39: Line 39:


==ICANN Involvement==
==ICANN Involvement==
FairWinds is a observatory member of the [[BC|Business Constituency]] within ICANN, and a voting member of the New TLD Applicant Group ([[NTAG]]) in the [[Registry Stakeholder Group]], since they applied for [[.fairwinds]].
FairWinds is an observatory member of the [[BC|Business Constituency]] within ICANN, and a voting member of the New TLD Applicant Group ([[NTAG]]) in the [[Registry Stakeholder Group]] since they applied for [[.fairwinds]].


In 2009, Mr. Bourne, who serves as President of CADNA, asked the United States government to conduct a full-scale audit on ICANN's structure, governance and oversight mechanisms.<ref>[http://cadna.org/press-releases/2009/9/22/cadna-calls-for-full-scale-audit-of-icann CADNA Calls for Full Scale Audit of ICANN, CADNA Press Release] Retrieved 18 April 2014</ref> Bourne previously commented that ICANN failed to accomplish some of its responsibilities in the Affirmation of Commitments with United States [[DOC|Department of Commerce]].<ref>
In 2009, Mr. Bourne, who serves as President of CADNA, asked the United States government to conduct a full-scale audit on ICANN's structure, governance, and oversight mechanisms.<ref>[http://cadna.org/press-releases/2009/9/22/cadna-calls-for-full-scale-audit-of-icann CADNA Calls for Full-Scale Audit of ICANN, CADNA Press Release] Retrieved 18 April 2014</ref> Bourne previously commented that ICANN failed to accomplish some of its responsibilities in the Affirmation of Commitments with the United States [[DOC|Department of Commerce]].<ref>
[http://cadna.org/press-releases/2009/9/30/cadna-asserts-that-the-icann-affirmation-of-commitments-falls-short CADNA Asserts That The ICANN Affirmation of Commitments Falls Short]</ref>
[http://cadna.org/press-releases/2009/9/30/cadna-asserts-that-the-icann-affirmation-of-commitments-falls-short CADNA Asserts That The ICANN Affirmation of Commitments Falls Short]</ref>


In May 2013, FairWinds submitted public comments to ICANN on behalf of 16 brand owners advocating for a second template draft new [[TLD]] [[Registry Agreement]] that recognized the unique requirements of branded TLDs. It was argued that creating a standard contract for them would speed up the contracting process and help introduce new business models to the domain name space more quickly.<ref>[http://www.fairwindspartners.com/Our-Resources/FairWinds-in-the-Press/2013/Brand-Owners-Continue-Push-for-Separate-Contract-for-Brand-New-Top-Level-Domains/ Brand Owners continue push for separate contract for brand new top level domains] FairWinds website, Published May 22 2013 & retrieved 3rd December 2014.</ref>
In May 2013, FairWinds submitted public comments to ICANN on behalf of 16 brand owners advocating for a second template draft new [[TLD]] [[Registry Agreement]] that recognized the unique requirements of branded TLDs. It was argued that creating a standard contract for them would speed up the contracting process and help introduce new business models to the domain name space more quickly.<ref>[http://www.fairwindspartners.com/Our-Resources/FairWinds-in-the-Press/2013/Brand-Owners-Continue-Push-for-Separate-Contract-for-Brand-New-Top-Level-Domains/ Brand Owners continue to push for a separate contract for brand new top-level domains] FairWinds website, Published May 22, 2013, & retrieved 3rd December 2014.</ref>


==Affiliation with CADNA==
==Affiliation with CADNA==
CADNA and FairWinds Partners have at times seemingly been at odds, given that FairWinds is offering new gTLD consultancy services and CADNA has in the past led an oppositional effort against the [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]].
CADNA and FairWinds Partners have at times seemingly been at odds, given that FairWinds is offering new gTLD consultancy services and CADNA has in the past led an oppositional effort against the [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]].


In March 2012, FairWinds utilized their CADNA association to highlight that they are able to help brands [[Defensive Registration|defensively submit]] applications for [[gTLD]]s and [[Brand gTLD]]s. They explicitly noted that some brands should be choosing to apply for generic strings in an attempt to head-off any moves that their direct competitors may make for the same string; the brand could then choose to opt-out for a 70% refund should it find that its competitors did not apply and it is no longer interested in the string.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/8041-fairwinds-hard-sells-defensive-gtld-applications CADNA Hard Sells Defensive gTLD Applications, DomainIncite.com]</ref> FairWinds is not the only consultancy service that offered defensive registration services.The widespread perception that defensive registration was necessary was seen as a failure on ICANN's part, as ICANN originally led an outreach effort to educate brands that defensive registration is not necessary. The issue was largely addressed only after the [[New gTLD Program|new gTLd program]] was approved and high level critics, such as when Secretary [[Lawrence Strickling]] of the U.S. Government, called on the organization to rectify the situation.<ref>[http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/ntia_letter_on_gtld_program_jan_3_2012.pdf NTIA Letter on gTLD Program, NTIA.doc.gov]</ref>
In March 2012, FairWinds utilized their CADNA association to highlight that they are able to help brands [[Defensive Registration|defensively submit]] applications for [[gTLD]]s and [[Brand gTLD]]s. They explicitly noted that some brands should be choosing to apply for generic strings in an attempt to head off any moves that their direct competitors may make for the same string; the brand could then choose to opt out for a 70% refund should it find that its competitors did not apply and it is no longer interested in the string.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/8041-fairwinds-hard-sells-defensive-gtld-applications CADNA Hard Sells Defensive gTLD Applications, DomainIncite.com]</ref> FairWinds is not the only consultancy service that offered defensive registration services. The widespread perception that defensive registration was necessary was seen as a failure on ICANN's part, as ICANN originally led an outreach effort to educate brands that defensive registration is not necessary. The issue was largely addressed only after the [[New gTLD Program|new gTLD program]] was approved and high-level critics, such as when Secretary [[Lawrence Strickling]] of the U.S. Government, called on the organization to rectify the situation.<ref>[http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/ntia_letter_on_gtld_program_jan_3_2012.pdf NTIA Letter on gTLD Program, NTIA.doc.gov]</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 56: Line 56:
[[Category:Corporate Brand Protection]]
[[Category:Corporate Brand Protection]]
[[Category:NTLD Applicants]]
[[Category:NTLD Applicants]]
[[Category:Past Sponsors]]
[[Category:Sponsor]]

Latest revision as of 18:40, 11 October 2022

Type: Privately held
Industry: Domain Name Consultation
Founded: 2006
Founder(s): Josh Bourne
Phil Lodico
Headquarters: Washington, D.C.
Country: USA
Website: www.fairwindspartners.com
Blog: gTLDStrategy.com
LinkedIn: FairWinds Partners
Key People
Joshua Bourne and Phil Lodico, Managing Partners
Nao Matsukata, President & CEO

FairWinds Partners is a Domain Name consulting firm co-founded by Managing Partners Josh Bourne and Phil Lodico in 2006. The firm aims to help its clients to increase their revenue using their domain names, provide relevant information regarding the latest online technologies and opportunities, and help clients to protect their domain investments. Fairwinds Partners is located in Washington, D.C.[1]

FairWinds Partners submitted 134 applications to ICANN's New gTLD Program on behalf of its clients. The company also applied for the Brand TLD .fairwinds.[2] They are the organizers behind a nonprofit organization and Domain Name conference Beyond The Dot.[3]

Joshua Bourne and Phil Lodico also co-founded the Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse (CADNA).[4]

Services[edit | edit source]

Fairwinds Partners provides the following services to its clients:[5]

  • Domain Name Strategy and Advisory
  • gTLD Strategy: Top-Level Solutions
  • S.M.A.R.T. gTLD Service
  • New gTLD Brand Protection and Trademark Services
  • Domain Name and Username Recovery
  • Domain Name Program Administration
  • Social Media Strategy and Portfolio

ICANN Involvement[edit | edit source]

FairWinds is an observatory member of the Business Constituency within ICANN, and a voting member of the New TLD Applicant Group (NTAG) in the Registry Stakeholder Group since they applied for .fairwinds.

In 2009, Mr. Bourne, who serves as President of CADNA, asked the United States government to conduct a full-scale audit on ICANN's structure, governance, and oversight mechanisms.[6] Bourne previously commented that ICANN failed to accomplish some of its responsibilities in the Affirmation of Commitments with the United States Department of Commerce.[7]

In May 2013, FairWinds submitted public comments to ICANN on behalf of 16 brand owners advocating for a second template draft new TLD Registry Agreement that recognized the unique requirements of branded TLDs. It was argued that creating a standard contract for them would speed up the contracting process and help introduce new business models to the domain name space more quickly.[8]

Affiliation with CADNA[edit | edit source]

CADNA and FairWinds Partners have at times seemingly been at odds, given that FairWinds is offering new gTLD consultancy services and CADNA has in the past led an oppositional effort against the new gTLD program.

In March 2012, FairWinds utilized their CADNA association to highlight that they are able to help brands defensively submit applications for gTLDs and Brand gTLDs. They explicitly noted that some brands should be choosing to apply for generic strings in an attempt to head off any moves that their direct competitors may make for the same string; the brand could then choose to opt out for a 70% refund should it find that its competitors did not apply and it is no longer interested in the string.[9] FairWinds is not the only consultancy service that offered defensive registration services. The widespread perception that defensive registration was necessary was seen as a failure on ICANN's part, as ICANN originally led an outreach effort to educate brands that defensive registration is not necessary. The issue was largely addressed only after the new gTLD program was approved and high-level critics, such as when Secretary Lawrence Strickling of the U.S. Government, called on the organization to rectify the situation.[10]

References[edit | edit source]