User talk:TedErnst: Difference between revisions
→linking to wp: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
sure, if they're not articles we'd logically want here, that makes sense [[User:Ray|Ray]] | sure, if they're not articles we'd logically want here, that makes sense [[User:Ray|Ray]] | ||
==Dotster== | |||
Thanks for checking the ref link, I have added another one there and I got the point of making bullets instead of putting numbers. | |||
[[User:Muhammad Ali Khalid|Muhammad Ali Khalid]] |
Revision as of 16:53, 1 October 2010
Welcome
Great to see you here! Ray
hi
I have seen the changes, thanks a lot, you have added quite a lot of information to it. I remember I just posted three lines and a list of people, but now it is a complete whole history and stuff. :). It is great.
Ali
No I did not know about the history function, thanks for letting me know. There is a lot of formatting that needs to be done in the article, I mean related to the references, do you want to do it, or should I do it?Muhammad Ali Khalid
Yeah I also noted that the reflist function was not working, okay I guess delaying the formatting would be better, until it the reflist is done. Till then I can work on the content and the images. right?
Reflist template
Ted, do you have any idea how to get the Reflist template (from WP) working? Ray
- yikes, can you help figure out what extension, etc.? I have someone who can get it done if I can communicate to him what exactly needs to be done. Also, can we get an example of a company template going?
linking to wp
sure, if they're not articles we'd logically want here, that makes sense Ray
Dotster
Thanks for checking the ref link, I have added another one there and I got the point of making bullets instead of putting numbers. Muhammad Ali Khalid