Talk:Sarah Langstone: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:SarahlangstonePortrait.jpg|300px]] [[Image:SarahlangstoneCaricature.jpg|300px]] | |||
-In the career history section it seems that the title followed by the company and the time frame make for a more accessible format. I also think it makes more sense to start from the present and work backward, though I'd be interested to hear what others have to say. | -In the career history section it seems that the title followed by the company and the time frame make for a more accessible format. I also think it makes more sense to start from the present and work backward, though I'd be interested to hear what others have to say. | ||
: Yeah, I do like the current position at the top and consistency with Title, Company, Timeframe ... | : Yeah, I do like the current position at the top and consistency with Title, Company, Timeframe ... | ||
Revision as of 07:04, 6 July 2011
-In the career history section it seems that the title followed by the company and the time frame make for a more accessible format. I also think it makes more sense to start from the present and work backward, though I'd be interested to hear what others have to say.
- Yeah, I do like the current position at the top and consistency with Title, Company, Timeframe ...