.ком: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
The initial target audience for CYRILLIC_TRANSLITERATION_OF_.COM is the registrants of the more than 30,000 Cyrillic IDN second-level addresses in .com. These registrants will have the opportunity to register their IDN.com addresses as IDN. CYRILLIC_TRANSLITERATION_OF_.COM addresses."<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus Application Download from gTLDresult.ICANN.org]Retrieved 16 Jan 2013</ref> | The initial target audience for CYRILLIC_TRANSLITERATION_OF_.COM is the registrants of the more than 30,000 Cyrillic IDN second-level addresses in .com. These registrants will have the opportunity to register their IDN.com addresses as IDN. CYRILLIC_TRANSLITERATION_OF_.COM addresses."<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus Application Download from gTLDresult.ICANN.org]Retrieved 16 Jan 2013</ref> | ||
==Objection== | |||
An official Legal Rights Objection was filed by Regtime Ltd.; Legato Ltd. against the applicant.<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/cases/ LRO Cases, WIPO.int]</ref> | |||
A Legal Rights Objection, as defined by the ICANN approved mediator, [[WIPO]], is when, "third parties may file a formal objection to an application on several grounds, including, for trademark owners and Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) [..] When such an objection is filed, an independent panel (comprised of one or three experts) will determine whether the applicant’s potential use of the applied-for gTLD would be likely to infringe [..] the objector’s existing trademark, or IGO name or acronym."<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/ LRO, WIPO.int] Retrieved 25 March 2013</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 17:35, 25 March 2013
| Status: | Proposed |
| Language: | Russian |
| Translates to: | Transliteration of "com" |
| Manager: | Verisign |
| Registry Provider: | Verisign |
| Type: | IDN gTLD |
| Category: | Technology |
| Priority #: | 61 |
More information: 
| |
.ком is an IDN gTLD being proposed in ICANN's New gTLD Program. The applicant is Verisign.[1]
IDN Transliterations of .com & .net[edit | edit source]
Verisign's Pat Kane noted in January 2012 that the company was planning on applying for "about 12" new gTLDs, and noted that most of these were going to be IDN transliterations of .com.[2] Expected languages included Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Cyrillic, Arabic, and Hebrew.[3][4]
During its first quarter earnings report, on April 26, 2012, it was confirmed that Verisign would be applying for 14 new gTLDs, 12 of which are foreign language transliterations of .com and .net.
In the end, the languages chosen for transliterations are: Thai, Deva, Korean (Hang), Chinese (Hant/Traditional & Hans/Simplified), Hebrew, Russian, Arabic, Japanese. The two non-IDN applications by the company are for .comsec and .verisign.
Application[edit | edit source]
Excerpted from response to question #18 in TLD application:
"As of this writing, more than 800,000 internationalized second-level domain names are registered in .com, including more than 30,000 in Cyrillic. The CYRILLIC_TRANSLITERATION_OF_.COM gTLD, along with the other proposed IDN transliterations of .com, provide an immediate benefit to registrants of those names by giving them the opportunity to register IDN second-level domain names as “IDN.IDN” domain names. That is, registrants can use their preferred script in both the second-level domain name and the gTLD name. Doing so improves these domain names’ functionality and accessibility to speakers of non-Latin-based languages.
[..]
The initial target audience for CYRILLIC_TRANSLITERATION_OF_.COM is the registrants of the more than 30,000 Cyrillic IDN second-level addresses in .com. These registrants will have the opportunity to register their IDN.com addresses as IDN. CYRILLIC_TRANSLITERATION_OF_.COM addresses."[5]
Objection[edit | edit source]
An official Legal Rights Objection was filed by Regtime Ltd.; Legato Ltd. against the applicant.[6]
A Legal Rights Objection, as defined by the ICANN approved mediator, WIPO, is when, "third parties may file a formal objection to an application on several grounds, including, for trademark owners and Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) [..] When such an objection is filed, an independent panel (comprised of one or three experts) will determine whether the applicant’s potential use of the applied-for gTLD would be likely to infringe [..] the objector’s existing trademark, or IGO name or acronym."[7]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings
- ↑ 2011 Results Earnings Call Transcript, SeekingAlpha.com. Published 26 January 2012.
- ↑ Verisign Plans to Apply for About 12 New Top Level Domain Names, DomainNameWire.com. Published 26 January 2012.
- ↑ Verisign to Apply for a Dozen New gTLDs, DomainIncite.com. Published 27 January 2012.
- ↑ Application Download from gTLDresult.ICANN.orgRetrieved 16 Jan 2013
- ↑ LRO Cases, WIPO.int
- ↑ LRO, WIPO.int Retrieved 25 March 2013