Jump to content

.reviews: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
|category = [[:Category:Commerce New gTLDs|Commerce]]
|category = [[:Category:Commerce New gTLDs|Commerce]]
|community  =
|community  =
|PIC = [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/611 Download Here]
|priority = 435 - [[Donuts]] (Extra Cover, LLC)
|priority = 435 - [[Donuts]] (Extra Cover, LLC)
|keypeople  =
|keypeople  =
}}
}}


'''.reviews''' is a proposed [[TLD]] in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]]. The applicant is [[Donuts]] (Extra Cover, LLC). Several applicants applied for a similar string, [[.review]].<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings]</ref>
'''.reviews''' is a proposed [[TLD]] in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]]. The applicant is [[Donuts]] (Extra Cover, LLC). Several applicants applied for [[.review]].<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings]</ref>


===Application Details===
===Application Details===

Revision as of 18:51, 13 March 2013

Status: Proposed
Registry Provider: Demand Media
Type: Generic
Category: Commerce
PIC Submitted: Download Here

More information:

.reviews is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program. The applicant is Donuts (Extra Cover, LLC). Several applicants applied for .review.[1]

Application Details[edit | edit source]

Many of Donuts' applications, including this one, seem to have been applied for using the same boiler-plate application in which the TLD is defined as a means of providing greater expression on the Internet and will be an open TLD without pre-registration policies. It notes its plans to adhere with all registration policies required by ICANN and its intent to have remediation and takedown policies clearly defined to fit within these requirements. Pre-registration verification will not be used and this as defined as causing "cause more harm than benefit by denying domain access to legitimate registrants." They intend to control abuse through "extensive user and rights protections."[2]

References[edit | edit source]