.goo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|category = | |category = | ||
|community = | |community = | ||
|priority = 347 - [[NTT Resonant Inc.]]<br>1814 - [[Google]] ([[Charleston Road Registry Inc.]]) | |priority = 347 - [[NTT Resonant Inc.]]<br><s>1814 - [[Google]] ([[Charleston Road Registry Inc.]])</s> | ||
|keypeople = | |keypeople = | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''.goo''' is a [[Brand TLD]] being proposed in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]]. | '''.goo''' is a [[Brand TLD]] being proposed in [[ICANN]]'s [[New gTLD Program]]. [[NTT Resonant Inc.]] is the only remaining applicant for the string; [[Google]] had originally applied for the string as well.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings]</ref> | ||
===Objection=== | ===Objection=== | ||
An official Legal Rights Objection was filed by the applicant [[NTT Resonant Inc.]] against fellow applicant [[Google]].<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/cases/ LRO Cases, WIPO.int]</ref> | An official Legal Rights Objection was filed by the applicant [[NTT Resonant Inc.]] against fellow applicant [[Google]].<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/cases/ LRO Cases, WIPO.int]</ref> | ||
A Legal Rights Objection, as defined by the ICANN approved mediator, [[WIPO]], is when, "third parties may file a formal objection to an application on several grounds, including, for trademark owners and Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) [..] When such an objection is filed, an independent panel (comprised of one or three experts) will determine whether the applicant’s potential use of the applied-for gTLD would be likely to infringe [..] the objector’s existing trademark, or IGO name or acronym."<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/ LRO, WIPO.int] Retrieved 25 March 2013</ref> | A Legal Rights Objection, as defined by the ICANN approved mediator, [[WIPO]], is when, "third parties may file a formal objection to an application on several grounds, including, for trademark owners and Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) [..] When such an objection is filed, an independent panel (comprised of one or three experts) will determine whether the applicant’s potential use of the applied-for gTLD would be likely to infringe [..] the objector’s existing trademark, or IGO name or acronym."<ref>[http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/lro/ LRO, WIPO.int] Retrieved 25 March 2013</ref> | ||
[[Google]] subsequently withdrew its application in June 2013.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/13446-google-beaten-in-new-gtld-contention-set Google Beaten in New gTLD Contention Set, DomainIncite.com] published & Retrieved 18 June 2013</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 16:20, 18 June 2013
| Status: | Proposed |
| Type: | Brand TLD |
More information: 
| |
.goo is a Brand TLD being proposed in ICANN's New gTLD Program. NTT Resonant Inc. is the only remaining applicant for the string; Google had originally applied for the string as well.[1]
Objection
An official Legal Rights Objection was filed by the applicant NTT Resonant Inc. against fellow applicant Google.[2]
A Legal Rights Objection, as defined by the ICANN approved mediator, WIPO, is when, "third parties may file a formal objection to an application on several grounds, including, for trademark owners and Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) [..] When such an objection is filed, an independent panel (comprised of one or three experts) will determine whether the applicant’s potential use of the applied-for gTLD would be likely to infringe [..] the objector’s existing trademark, or IGO name or acronym."[3]
Google subsequently withdrew its application in June 2013.[4]
References
- ↑ Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings
- ↑ LRO Cases, WIPO.int
- ↑ LRO, WIPO.int Retrieved 25 March 2013
- ↑ Google Beaten in New gTLD Contention Set, DomainIncite.com published & Retrieved 18 June 2013