Bureaucrats, staff, Administrators
416
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Line 5:
Line 20: + + + +
+resources
'''Fiona Alexander''' serves as Associate Administrator of the Office of International Affairs at [[NTIA]].
{{People
|portrait =
|caricature =
|affiliation =
|born =
|country = USA
|email =
|website =
|blog =
|twitter =
|facebook =
|google =
|linkedin = [https://www.linkedin.com/in/fiona-alexander-6981655 LinkedIn]
|userbox =
}}
'''Fiona Alexander''' serves as Associate Administrator of the Office of International Affairs at [[NTIA]].<ref>[http://www.ntia.doc.gov/page/oia-staff-directory OIA Staff Directory], National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Retrieved November 19, 2015.</ref>
==New gTLD Senate and House of Representatives Hearings==
==New gTLD Senate and House of Representatives Hearings==
On December 14, a second hearing was held, hosted by the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee. Those speaking at this hearing were Alexander, Jaffe, and Pritz, plus [[Thomas Embrescia]] (CEO, [[Employ Media]]), and [[Joshua Bourne]] ([[CADNA]]).<ref>[http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/12/13/house-hearing-testimonies What the House testimonies tell us, dot-nxt.com]</ref> The result of the House hearing was the suggestion that the program be delayed until there is a consensus between all relevant stakeholders, made by Rep. Eshoo. Pritz and Alexander came to the defense of ICANN's [[Multistakeholder Model]], arguing that the process had not been rushed. It had taken ICANN seven years to get to the point where all the issues had been discussed and no new issues were being raised, during which time they had consulted all the relevant stakeholders. Alexander made the point that "consensus" does not always mean "unanimity."
On December 14, a second hearing was held, hosted by the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee. Those speaking at this hearing were Alexander, Jaffe, and Pritz, plus [[Thomas Embrescia]] (CEO, [[Employ Media]]), and [[Joshua Bourne]] ([[CADNA]]).<ref>[http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/12/13/house-hearing-testimonies What the House testimonies tell us, dot-nxt.com]</ref> The result of the House hearing was the suggestion that the program be delayed until there is a consensus between all relevant stakeholders, made by Rep. Eshoo. Pritz and Alexander came to the defense of ICANN's [[Multistakeholder Model]], arguing that the process had not been rushed. It had taken ICANN seven years to get to the point where all the issues had been discussed and no new issues were being raised, during which time they had consulted all the relevant stakeholders. Alexander made the point that "consensus" does not always mean "unanimity."
==Resources==
* [http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/mag/45-mag-membership/1305-ms-alexander-fiona The Multistakeholder Advisory Group: Ms. Alexander, Fiona] at the Internet Governance Forum
* [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/pritz-to-alexander-29apr09-en.pdf ICANN's April 29, 2009 letter to Alexander] (PDF)
==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}