Bureaucrats, staff, Administrators
3,007
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 85:
Line 85: − Line 95:
Line 94: + + + +
→From Joel
== From Joel ==
== From Joel ==
Hi Ray
Hi Ray
What I don't understand is the plastic surgery done to Edmon Chung's page so that it contains no reference to the 3 lawsuits facing him. These lawsuits have been filed against both Edmon Chung and DotAsia. The lawsuits cover the same transgressions, but the charges against Edmon and the charges against DotAsia are separate. It is technically possible that the suit against DotAsia may be dismissed (although Unlikely), while the suit against Edmon may not.
What I don't understand is the plastic surgery done to Edmon Chung's page so that it contains no reference to the 3 lawsuits facing him. These lawsuits have been filed against both Edmon Chung and DotAsia. The lawsuits cover the same transgressions, but the charges against Edmon and the charges against DotAsia are separate. It is technically possible that the suit against DotAsia may be dismissed (although Unlikely), while the suit against Edmon may not.
So I think it is only proper that the reference to the lawsuit should appear on both the DotAsia page and the Edmon Chung page.
So I think it is only proper that the reference to the lawsuit should appear on both the DotAsia page and the Edmon Chung page.
== Response ==
Joel,
Your point is valid. We responded initially because you had added the same content to multiple pages which would be a problem in general if we did that for every employee of a company that was in a lawsuit. That said, since edmon is separately named and you mention that the cases are not identical, we added it back to his page. [[User:Ray|Ray]] ([[User talk:Ray|talk]])