3,197
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 150:
Line 150: − + Line 171:
Line 171: − + Line 178:
Line 178: − + Line 185:
Line 185: − + Line 192:
Line 192: − + Line 199:
Line 199: − + Line 206:
Line 206: − + − + Line 220:
Line 220: − + Line 229:
Line 229: − + − + − + Line 241:
Line 241: − + Line 248:
Line 248: − + Line 269:
Line 269: − + Line 276:
Line 276: − + Line 290:
Line 290: − + − + − + Line 304:
Line 304: − + Line 339:
Line 339: − + Line 353:
Line 353: − + Line 388:
Line 388: − + Line 395:
Line 395: − + Line 402:
Line 402: − + Line 409:
Line 409: − + Line 423:
Line 423: − + Line 451:
Line 451: − + Line 465:
Line 465: − + Line 472:
Line 472: − + − + Line 537:
Line 537: − + Line 563:
Line 563: − + Line 598:
Line 598: − + Line 633:
Line 633: − + Line 656:
Line 656: − + Line 668:
Line 668: − + Line 682:
Line 682: − + Line 691:
Line 691: − + − + Line 761:
Line 761: − + Line 817:
Line 817: − + Line 864:
Line 864: − + Line 885:
Line 885: − + Line 892:
Line 892: − + Line 920:
Line 920: − + Line 927:
Line 927: − + − +
Documentary Information Disclosure Policy (view source)
Revision as of 20:33, 3 February 2022
, 2 years ago→Summary Tables of DIDP Requests & Responses
| [[Alejandra Barrientos]]
| [[Alejandra Barrientos]]
| Needed to learn about a specific provision of [[RFC 1591]]
| Needed to learn about a specific provision of [[RFC 1591]]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20090925-1/barrientos-response-25sep09-en.pdf Provided]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20090925-1/barrientos-response-25sep09-en.pdf Provided a link to the RFC]
| No
| No
|
|
| [[Michael Palage]]
| [[Michael Palage]]
| Documents relating to an agreement between ICANN and the New South Wales government regarding the funding of ICANN Sydney's office.
| Documents relating to an agreement between ICANN and the New South Wales government regarding the funding of ICANN Sydney's office.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100624-1/palage-response-22jul10-en.pdf Could not divulge details] of a confidential agreement. ICANN subsequently requested whether NSW would allow disclosure; that request was [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100624-1/palage-response-update-19oct10-en.pdf denied].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100624-1/palage-response-22jul10-en.pdf Declined] because ICANN could not divulge details of a confidential agreement. ICANN subsequently requested whether NSW would allow disclosure; that request was [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100624-1/palage-response-update-19oct10-en.pdf denied].
| 1 & 5
| 1 & 5
|
|
| Barry Carter
| Barry Carter
| A [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100820-1/carter-request-20aug10-en.pdf list of all registered domains] and all public [[registrant]] information.
| A [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100820-1/carter-request-20aug10-en.pdf list of all registered domains] and all public [[registrant]] information.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100820-1/carter-response-19sep10-en.pdf Provided partial information]. Directed the requestor towards publicly available records.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100820-1/carter-response-19sep10-en.pdf Pointed to publicly available records], declined to create or compile documents.
| 12
| 12
| Given that the number of registered domain names in gTLDs in 2010 was over 120 million,<ref>[https://www.statista.com/chart/1032/number-of-domain-names-since-2007/ Statista.com - Number of registered domain names since 2007], January 2013</ref> this request was massively broad.
| Given that the number of registered domain names in gTLDs in 2010 was over 120 million,<ref>[https://www.statista.com/chart/1032/number-of-domain-names-since-2007/ Statista.com - Number of registered domain names since 2007], January 2013</ref> this request was massively broad.
| [[Diane Duke]]
| [[Diane Duke]]
| Documentation pertaining to [[ICM Registry]]'s application for the [[.xxx]] TLD
| Documentation pertaining to [[ICM Registry]]'s application for the [[.xxx]] TLD
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100908-1/duke-response-07oct10-en.pdf Denied request]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100908-1/duke-response-07oct10-en.pdf Declined] to produce documents.
| 5
| 5
| The publicly available information regarding ICM's application was all that was available - ICM had requested that portions of their submissions be kept confidential.
| The publicly available information regarding ICM's application was all that was available - ICM had requested that portions of their submissions be kept confidential.
| [[Evan Leibovitch]] and [[Avri Doria]]
| [[Evan Leibovitch]] and [[Avri Doria]]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100927-1/leibovitch-request-29sep10-en.pdf Transcripts & presentation materials] for the staff report to the Board retreat on the issue of the [[New gTLD Program]] Applicant Support, as well as [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100927-1/leibovitch-supplemental-request-30sep10-en.pdf a vote count] on any decisions taken by the board regarding that topic.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100927-1/leibovitch-request-29sep10-en.pdf Transcripts & presentation materials] for the staff report to the Board retreat on the issue of the [[New gTLD Program]] Applicant Support, as well as [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100927-1/leibovitch-supplemental-request-30sep10-en.pdf a vote count] on any decisions taken by the board regarding that topic.
| No
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20100927-1/leibovitch-response-27oct10-en.pdf No documents produced].
| No
| No
| The Board Book from the retreat was scheduled to be released after approval of the minutes; preliminary report contained the relevant vote tally; staff presentations are not transcripted, so that could not be provided.
| The Board Book from the retreat was scheduled to be released after approval of the minutes; preliminary report contained the relevant vote tally; staff presentations are not transcripted, so that could not be provided.
| Iliya Bazlyankov
| Iliya Bazlyankov
| The criteria and decision process used to assess, and ultimately "reject" Bulgaria's application for an [[Internationalized Domain Name|IDN string]]
| The criteria and decision process used to assess, and ultimately "reject" Bulgaria's application for an [[Internationalized Domain Name|IDN string]]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20101201-1/bazlyankov-response-30dec10-en.pdf Denied]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20101201-1/bazlyankov-response-30dec10-en.pdf Declined]
| 2, 3, 5, & 11
| 2, 3, 5, & 11
| Response notes that IDN applications are not "rejected"
| Response notes that IDN applications are not "rejected"
| Jorge Sabate
| Jorge Sabate
| A list of all registered domains and registrant information - failing that, the "dste [sic] was created the domain name christiansmith.com"
| A list of all registered domains and registrant information - failing that, the "dste [sic] was created the domain name christiansmith.com"
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20101207-1/sabate-response-06jan11-en.pdf Denied]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20101207-1/sabate-response-06jan11-en.pdf Declined]
| 12
| 12
| Overly broad, WHOIS search would provide information about specific domains
| Overly broad; WHOIS search would provide information about specific domains
|-
|-
| 4 November 2010
| 4 November 2010
| [[Michael Palage]]
| [[Michael Palage]]
| Information related to ICANN's management of the L root server, including documents or explanations regarding why the L root's directory might not have been identical to the A root server in 2007. [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110310-1/palage-request-10mar11-en.pdf Full request here]
| Information related to ICANN's management of the L root server, including documents or explanations regarding why the L root's directory might not have been identical to the A root server in 2007. [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110310-1/palage-request-10mar11-en.pdf Full request here]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110310-1/palage-response-09apr11-en.pdf Denied in large part]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110310-1/palage-response-09apr11-en.pdf Linked to public information], declined to produce documents on threshold and DCND grounds.
| 5, 8, 9, & 10
| 5, 8, 9, & 10
| Response notes both that information is publicly available, and that ICANN is not responsible for "compiling" information in response to a DIDP request.
| Response notes both that information is publicly available, and that ICANN is not responsible for "compiling" information in response to a DIDP request.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110316-1/mccarthy-response-15apr11-en.pdf Request was deemed moot]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110316-1/mccarthy-response-15apr11-en.pdf Request was deemed moot]
| No
| No
| By the time ICANN issued a response, almost all of the information had been published, and the remainder was scheduled to be released upon approval of the minutes in which they were contanied.
| By the time ICANN issued a response, almost all of the information had been published, and the remainder was scheduled to be released upon approval of the minutes in which they were contained.
|-
|-
| 11 April 2011
| 11 April 2011
| Diane Duke
| Diane Duke
| Documentation relating to the International Foundation for Online Responsibility, and ICM Registry's contracts for labelling and monitoring (still regarding ICM's [[.xxx]] application
| Documentation relating to the International Foundation for Online Responsibility, and ICM Registry's contracts for labeling and monitoring (still regarding ICM's [[.xxx]] application)
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110411-1/duke-response-11may11-en.pdf No]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110411-1/duke-response-11may11-en.pdf Declined] to produce documents on threshold grounds
| No
| No
| ICANN did not possess that information
| ICANN did not possess that information
| Kevin Murphy
| Kevin Murphy
| Transcripts, documents, and any other record of [[Larry Strickling]]'s meeting with ICANN board members at [[ICANN 39]] in Cartagena, as well as any similar materials from [[ICANN 40]] in San Francisco, if a similar meeting occurred there
| Transcripts, documents, and any other record of [[Larry Strickling]]'s meeting with ICANN board members at [[ICANN 39]] in Cartagena, as well as any similar materials from [[ICANN 40]] in San Francisco, if a similar meeting occurred there
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110523-1/murphy-response-22jun11-en.pdf Provided link to Cartagena meeting]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110523-1/murphy-response-22jun11-en.pdf Provided link to Cartagena meeting]; could not produce documentation re: San Francisco
| No
| No
| No meeting occurred in San Francisco
| No meeting occurred in San Francisco
| Kieren McCarthy
| Kieren McCarthy
| Scorecard with respect to the status of implementation of the ATRT
| Scorecard with respect to the status of implementation of the ATRT
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110613-1/mccarthy-response-13jul11-en.pdf Pointed to publicly available report] from the ATRT team
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110613-1/mccarthy-response-13jul11-en.pdf Pointed to publicly available report] from the ATRT team; no documents produced
| No
| No
|
|
| [[Kieren McCarthy]]
| [[Kieren McCarthy]]
| List of Board Meetings, and their agendas and minutes, between 29 July 2011 and 16 August 2011
| List of Board Meetings, and their agendas and minutes, between 29 July 2011 and 16 August 2011
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110820-1/mccarthy-response-19sep11-en.pdf Pointed to Board Meetings page on ICANN.org]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110820-1/mccarthy-response-19sep11-en.pdf Pointed to Board Meetings page on ICANN.org]; no new documents produced
| No
| No
|
|
| Paul McGrady
| Paul McGrady
| Recordings and transcripts from "all public meetings" from May 2009 to the present (September 2011), "in which a non-Staff member made a comment which was recorded or transcribed."
| Recordings and transcripts from "all public meetings" from May 2009 to the present (September 2011), "in which a non-Staff member made a comment which was recorded or transcribed."
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110902-1/mcgrady-response-02oct11-en.pdf Denied]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110902-1/mcgrady-response-02oct11-en.pdf Declined] to produce non-public documents; pointed to public records
| "May include, but are not limited to," 1
| "May include, but are not limited to," 1
| Also noted that ICANN is not obligated to compile information in response to requests
| Also noted that ICANN is not obligated to compile information in response to requests
| [[Kieren McCarthy]]
| [[Kieren McCarthy]]
| Three separate DIDP requests related to McCarthy's earlier request for information about board meetings that occurred in the summer of 2011; the staff's interpretation of DIDP's scope and breadth; and the process used in researching & creating the responses to the DIDP requests.
| Three separate DIDP requests related to McCarthy's earlier request for information about board meetings that occurred in the summer of 2011; the staff's interpretation of DIDP's scope and breadth; and the process used in researching & creating the responses to the DIDP requests.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110919-1/mccarthy-response-20sep11-en.pdf Provided partial information] initially;<br /> [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110920-1/mccarthy-response-20oct11-en.pdf second response re: internal communication around DIDP requests];<br /> [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20111020-1/mccarthy-response-19nov11-en.pdf third response, citing multiple conditions for non-disclosure]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110919-1/mccarthy-response-20sep11-en.pdf Provided context] but declined to produce documents initially;<br /> [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20110920-1/mccarthy-response-20oct11-en.pdf second response] declining to produce internal documents or correspondence;<br /> [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20111020-1/mccarthy-response-19nov11-en.pdf third response] declining to produce documents specific to the deliberations and process of responding to prior DIDP requests.
| 2, 6, 8, & 9
| 2, 3, 6, 8, & 9
| This "conversation" via DIDP is noteworthy for providing some insight into ICANN's interpretation of the DIDP and its implementation practices
| This "conversation" via DIDP is noteworthy for providing some insight into ICANN's interpretation of the DIDP and its implementation practices.
|-
|-
| 27 October 2011
| 27 October 2011
| [[Kieren McCarthy]]
| [[Kieren McCarthy]]
| Requesting a copy of the [[First Accountability and Transparency Review|ATRT1]] implementation plan
| Requesting a copy of the [[First Accountability and Transparency Review|ATRT1]] implementation plan
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20111027-2-2014-02-18-en Plan was detailed in an ATRT report]
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20111027-2-2014-02-18-en Plan was detailed in an ATRT report]; did not disclose addtional documents
| No
| No
|
|
| John Bell, The [[.jobs]] Charter Compliance Coalition
| John Bell, The [[.jobs]] Charter Compliance Coalition
| Documents, party correspondence, and other information relating to the arbitration initiated by Employ Media LLC (the registry for [[.jobs]]) arising from the breach notice issued by ICANN on February 27, 2011. [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20120403-1/bell-request-03apr12-en.pdf Full request]
| Documents, party correspondence, and other information relating to the arbitration initiated by Employ Media LLC (the registry for [[.jobs]]) arising from the breach notice issued by ICANN on February 27, 2011. [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20120403-1/bell-request-03apr12-en.pdf Full request]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20120403-1/bell-response-03may12-en.pdf Provided context and the link to publicly available information about the arbitration]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20120403-1/bell-response-03may12-en.pdf Provided context and the link to publicly available information about the arbitration]; declined to produce other documents
| 1, 2, 4, 5, & 7
| 1, 2, 4, 5, & 7
|
|
| [[David Maher]]
| [[David Maher]]
| All documents related to the creation & operation of the [[Trademark Clearinghouse]], including the contract with the third party operator of the TMCH, and all information related to claims of intellectual property rights in specific strings. [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20120808-1/maher-request-08aug12-en.pdf Full request]
| All documents related to the creation & operation of the [[Trademark Clearinghouse]], including the contract with the third party operator of the TMCH, and all information related to claims of intellectual property rights in specific strings. [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20120808-1/maher-request-08aug12-en.pdf Full request]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20120808-1/maher-response-07sep12-en.pdf Provided some information & context], but largely declined to produce documents
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20120808-1/maher-response-07sep12-en.pdf Provided context information & links to published information], but declined to produce new documents
| 5, 6, 8, 9, & 11
| 5, 6, 8, 9, & 11
|
|
| Oksana Prykhodko
| Oksana Prykhodko
| Information re: delegation of the [[IDN]] [[ccTLD]] [[.ykp]] to Ukraine [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130326-1/prykhodko-request-26mar13-en.pdf Full request]
| Information re: delegation of the [[IDN]] [[ccTLD]] [[.ykp]] to Ukraine [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130326-1/prykhodko-request-26mar13-en.pdf Full request]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130326-1/prykhodko-response-24apr13-en.pdf Pointed to public information] but otherwise declined
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130326-1/prykhodko-response-24apr13-en.pdf Pointed to public information], otherwise declined
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, & 10
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, & 10
|
|
| [[Flip Petillion]]
| [[Flip Petillion]]
| Documents regarding the decision to place [[.hotels]] and .hoteis in a string [[contention set]]; and a follow-up request for more specifics that were not previously answered in the first response.
| Documents regarding the decision to place [[.hotels]] and .hoteis in a string [[contention set]]; and a follow-up request for more specifics that were not previously answered in the first response.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130328-1/petillion-response-27apr13-en.pdf Pointed to public information & provided some context]; [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130328-1/petillion-response-25jul13-en.pdf provided additional context] in response to the subsequent request, but largely declined
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130328-1/petillion-response-27apr13-en.pdf Pointed to public information & provided some context]; [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130328-1/petillion-response-25jul13-en.pdf provided additional context] in response to the subsequent request. Declined to produce documents.
| 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, & 11
| 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, & 11
|
|
| [[Kevin Murphy]]
| [[Kevin Murphy]]
| Recordings and transcripts of the meetings between ICANN and community members in Belgium and Los Angeles in November 2012 relating to the Trademark Clearinghouse, from which the "strawman" solution emerged and was accepted.
| Recordings and transcripts of the meetings between ICANN and community members in Belgium and Los Angeles in November 2012 relating to the Trademark Clearinghouse, from which the "strawman" solution emerged and was accepted.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130413-1/murphy-response-13may13-en.pdf Brussels was not recorded, LA was], recordings & transcripts would be posted shortly
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130413-1/murphy-response-13may13-en.pdf Brussels was not recorded, LA was], recordings & transcripts would be posted shortly. No non-public documentation provided.
| No
| No
|
|
| [[Thomas Indelicarto]], [[Verisign]]
| [[Thomas Indelicarto]], [[Verisign]]
| All correspondence received by ICANN regarding the organization's readiness to launch the [[New gTLD Program]], all ICANN responses, and all communications between ICANN staff and any member of the [[SSAC]] from January 2013 to date of request
| All correspondence received by ICANN regarding the organization's readiness to launch the [[New gTLD Program]], all ICANN responses, and all communications between ICANN staff and any member of the [[SSAC]] from January 2013 to date of request
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130422-1/indelicarto-response-19jun13-en.pdf Pointed to the New gTLD Program's correspondence page], and declined
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130422-1/indelicarto-response-19jun13-en.pdf Pointed to the New gTLD Program's correspondence page], and declined to produce any other documents
| 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, & 12
| 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, & 12
| Although the "SSAC communications" request only covered a four-month period, ICANN cited both the volume and variety of communications between [[AC]]s and staff and noted that Verisign did not specify what they were looking for with any particularity
| Although the "SSAC communications" request only covered a four-month period, ICANN cited both the volume and variety of communications between [[AC]]s and staff and noted that Verisign did not specify what they were looking for with any particularity
| George Kirikos
| George Kirikos
| Documents, recordings, and transcripts of meetings, presentations, and other work of the Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services
| Documents, recordings, and transcripts of meetings, presentations, and other work of the Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130626-1/kirikos-response-26jul13-en.pdf Pointed to public records, otherwise declined]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20130626-1/kirikos-response-26jul13-en.pdf Pointed to public records], otherwise declined
| 2, 3, 5, & 9
| 2, 3, 5, & 9
|
|
| [[ICOMP]]
| [[ICOMP]]
| Correspondence, deliberations, and other documents related to ICOMP's [[Community Objection]] to Google's application for [[.search]]. [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20140320-2/request-icomp-20mar14-en.pdf Full request]
| Correspondence, deliberations, and other documents related to ICOMP's [[Community Objection]] to Google's application for [[.search]]. [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20140320-2/request-icomp-20mar14-en.pdf Full request]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20140320-2/response-icomp-19apr14-en.pdf Responded] that all information that was not already public was subject to a condition of nondisclosure
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20140320-2/response-icomp-19apr14-en.pdf Declined] - all information that was not already public was subject to a condition of nondisclosure
| 2, 5, 6, 9, & 11
| 2, 5, 6, 9, & 11
|
|
| Amazon EU S.a.r.l.
| Amazon EU S.a.r.l.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/request-amazon-23may14-en.pdf Extensive list] of disclosure requests related to ICANN's acceptance of the third party neutral's decision to place Amazon's application for [[.amazon]], as well as Chinese & Japanese character strings for the same name, be placed on hold.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/request-amazon-23may14-en.pdf Extensive list] of disclosure requests related to ICANN's acceptance of the third party neutral's decision to place Amazon's application for [[.amazon]], as well as Chinese & Japanese character strings for the same name, be placed on hold.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/response-amazon-22jun14-en.pdf Pointed] to public record, did not find anything else that was not subject to a condition of nondisclosure
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/response-amazon-22jun14-en.pdf Pointed] to public record, declined to produce other documents on threshold & DCND grounds
| 2, 3, 8, & 12
| 2, 3, 8, & 12
| The request also asked for GAC deliberations & records on the issue, which ICANN noted was not something they would normally be in possession of.
| The request also asked for GAC deliberations & records on the issue, which ICANN noted was not something they would normally be in possession of.
| [[Donuts]], Inc.; [[FairWinds Partners]], LLC; [[Fegistry]] LLC; [[Famous Four Media]] Limited; [[Minds + Machines]]; and [[Radix]] FZC
| [[Donuts]], Inc.; [[FairWinds Partners]], LLC; [[Fegistry]] LLC; [[Famous Four Media]] Limited; [[Minds + Machines]]; and [[Radix]] FZC
| All communications related to the successful [[Community Priority Evaluation]] (“CPE”) of HOTEL Top-Level-Domain S.a.r.l.'s community application for [[.hotel]]; all communications related to the appointment of the CPE Panel that produced the Report. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/request-donuts-et-al-04aug14-en.pdf Full request]
| All communications related to the successful [[Community Priority Evaluation]] (“CPE”) of HOTEL Top-Level-Domain S.a.r.l.'s community application for [[.hotel]]; all communications related to the appointment of the CPE Panel that produced the Report. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/request-donuts-et-al-04aug14-en.pdf Full request]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20140804-01/response-donuts-et-al-03sep14-en.pdf Partial response & some context]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20140804-01/response-donuts-et-al-03sep14-en.pdf Pointed to public information], declined to produce non-public documents
| 2, 3, 5, 6, & 9
| 2, 3, 5, 6, & 9
| The request made efforts to overcome possible conditions of nondisclosure. However, from the ICANN response: "Although your analysis in the Request concluded that no Conditions for Nondisclosure should apply, ICANN must independently undertake the analysis of each Condition as it applies to the documentation at issue, and make the final determination as to whether any Nondisclosure Conditions apply. Here, for example, ICANN cannot violate contractual conditions that require ICANN to maintain items as confidential solely because the Request proffers that no such conditions apply. Similarly, ICANN does not release draft documentation – particularly if draft documentation was shared for the purpose of facilitating deliberations or decision making – because drafts are not reliable sources of information regarding what actually occurred or standards that were actually applied."
| The request made efforts to preempt possible conditions of nondisclosure. However, from the ICANN response: "Although your analysis in the Request concluded that no Conditions for Nondisclosure should apply, ICANN must independently undertake the analysis of each Condition as it applies to the documentation at issue, and make the final determination as to whether any Nondisclosure Conditions apply. Here, for example, ICANN cannot violate contractual conditions that require ICANN to maintain items as confidential solely because the Request proffers that no such conditions apply. Similarly, ICANN does not release draft documentation – particularly if draft documentation was shared for the purpose of facilitating deliberations or decision making – because drafts are not reliable sources of information regarding what actually occurred or standards that were actually applied."
|-
|-
| 4 September 2014
| 4 September 2014
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-21jan15-en.pdf Provided documentation from 2012 forward]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-21jan15-en.pdf Provided documentation from 2012 forward]
| 12
| 12
| ICANN adopted a new method of finacial reporting based on this DIDP request; however, earlier financial data was stored in a different system, and conversion of that data into a the new form of reporting would be overly burdensome (condition 12)
| ICANN adopted a new method of financial reporting based on this DIDP request; however, earlier financial data was stored in a different system, and conversion of that data into a the new form of reporting would be overly burdensome
|-
|-
| 24 December 2014
| 24 December 2014
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Information pertaining to the formation and operation of ICANN's Globalization Advisory Groups
| Information pertaining to the formation and operation of ICANN's Globalization Advisory Groups
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-globalization-advisory-response-11feb15-en.pdf Provided answers] regarding the dissolution of the groups
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-globalization-advisory-response-11feb15-en.pdf Provided answers] regarding the dissolution of the groups; no documents provided
| No
| No
| The [[IANA Functions Stewardship Transition]] spurred new community initiatives that were largely duplicative of the Globalization Advisory Groups. As a result, the groups were dissolved a month after they were created.
| The [[IANA Functions Stewardship Transition]] spurred new community initiatives that were largely duplicative of the Globalization Advisory Groups. As a result, the groups were dissolved a month after they were created.
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Details of contract fees paid by the [[Regional Internet Registry|RIRs]] from 1999-2014, including a breakdown of contributions from each.
| Details of contract fees paid by the [[Regional Internet Registry|RIRs]] from 1999-2014, including a breakdown of contributions from each.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-08mar15-en.pdf Pointed to published financial information], no other documents released
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-08mar15-en.pdf Pointed to published financial information], declined on threshold grounds (no such docs in ICANN's possession)
| No
| No
| The response noted that NRO only published breakdowns of contributions by RIR for three years from 2003-2005
| The response noted that NRO only published breakdowns of contributions by RIR for three years from 2003-2005
| James Bridle
| James Bridle
| Documents relating to the delegation and operation of [[.io]], including correspondence between ICANN and the delegated authority
| Documents relating to the delegation and operation of [[.io]], including correspondence between ICANN and the delegated authority
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150427-1-bridle-27may15-en.pdf Provided context] but did not produce documents
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150427-1-bridle-27may15-en.pdf Provided context] but declined to produce documents on threshold and DCND grounds
| 1, 2, 3, 9, & 10
| 1, 2, 3, 9, & 10
| [[.io]] is an [[Open Use ccTLD]] that was delegated by IANA in 1997, prior to the formation of ICANN, and using IANA's standard procedure for assigning operation of [[ccTLD]]s, as described in [[RFC 1591]]
| [[.io]] is an [[Open Use ccTLD]] that was delegated by IANA in 1997, prior to the formation of ICANN, and using IANA's standard procedure for assigning operation of [[ccTLD]]s, as described in [[RFC 1591]]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150722-1-21aug15-en.pdf Declined]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150722-1-21aug15-en.pdf Declined]
| 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, & 12
| 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, & 12
| Request is duplicative of CIS' earlier request for information about ICANN's implementation of NETMundial principles
| Request was duplicative of CIS' earlier request for information about ICANN's implementation of NETMundial principles
|-
|-
| 22 July 2015
| 22 July 2015
| [[Kevin Murphy]]
| [[Kevin Murphy]]
| Unredacted documents, filings, and exhibits in the [[Independent Review Process]] DotConnectAfrica Trust v. ICANN
| Unredacted documents, filings, and exhibits in the [[Independent Review Process]] DotConnectAfrica Trust v. ICANN
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-corrected-20150727-1-murphy-27aug15-en.pdf Pointed to public record], noted that recent updated documents were substantially less redacted, and agreed to consult with the parties to see if further redactions were possible (no result)
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-corrected-20150727-1-murphy-27aug15-en.pdf Pointed to public record], noted that recently updated documents were substantially less redacted, and agreed to consult with the parties to see if further redactions were possible (no result). Did not produce new documents.
| 1, 2, 5, & 9
| 1, 2, 5, & 9
|
|
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Documentary information regarding steps or enforcement actions taken by [[Contractual Compliance]] in response to its audits of registries, and specifically any communications between Contractual Compliance and Verisign. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-request-20150901-3-01sep15-en.pdf Full request].
| Documentary information regarding steps or enforcement actions taken by [[Contractual Compliance]] in response to its audits of registries, and specifically any communications between Contractual Compliance and Verisign. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-request-20150901-3-01sep15-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150901-3-cis-contractual-violations-verisign-01oct15-en.pdf Provided public information and context], but no additional documents
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150901-3-cis-contractual-violations-verisign-01oct15-en.pdf Provided public information and context], but declined to produce additional documents
| 3, 5, & 6
| 3, 5, & 6
|
|
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150901-4-cis-abuse-complaints-01oct15-en.pdf Declined]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150901-4-cis-abuse-complaints-01oct15-en.pdf Declined]
| 2, 3, & 5
| 2, 3, & 5
| The vast majority of records requested are in the custody of each registrar, not ICANN. Those in ICANN's possession are subject to the DCND
| The vast majority of records requested were in the custody of each registrar, not ICANN. Those in ICANN's possession were subject to the DCND
|-
|-
| 1 September 2015
| 1 September 2015
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Centre for Internet and Society
| The names of those working in [[Contractual Compliance]], a "copy of the document that calls for appointments to the post of the contractual compliance auditor," and the contract between ICANN and that auditor.
| The names of those working in [[Contractual Compliance]], a "copy of the document that calls for appointments to the post of the contractual compliance auditor," and the contract between ICANN and that auditor.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150901-5-cis-auditor-appt-01oct15-en.pdf Posted RFP information] for the call for a compliance auditor; compliance staff was already public; contract with KMPG (the selected audit partner) will not be disclosed
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150901-5-cis-auditor-appt-01oct15-en.pdf Posted public RFP information] for the call for a compliance auditor; compliance staff was already public; contract with KMPG (the selected audit partner) will not be disclosed
| 2, 3, 5, & 6
| 2, 3, 5, & 6
|
|
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20151130-1-cis-response-30dec15-en.pdf Declined]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20151130-1-cis-response-30dec15-en.pdf Declined]
|
|
| The response noted that the DIDP request was very broad; however, as there were no documents in ICANN's possession responsive to the request, it was not cited as a Defined Condition of Nondisclosure
| The response noted that the DIDP request was very broad; however, as there were no documents in ICANN's possession responsive to the request, DCND 12 was not "officially" cited
|-
|-
| 30 November 2015
| 30 November 2015
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20160423-5-cis-response-21may16-en.pdf Reported] that ICANN was conducting a statistical analysis of the the DIDP program and would post results on its website. Otherwise declined.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20160423-5-cis-response-21may16-en.pdf Reported] that ICANN was conducting a statistical analysis of the the DIDP program and would post results on its website. Otherwise declined.
| 2, 6, & 8
| 2, 6, & 8
| "With respect to the research summary that you provided in your DIDP Request and that you presented at the Non Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) Session, held on 8 March 2016 at [[ICANN55]] (referenced in your Request), while it is not within the parameters of a DIDP request or response for ICANN to review your research “for accuracy” as you request in your presentation, ICANN does note several discrepancies with the information and/or characterizations provided in your summary. In several instances, your characterizations of “no” or “partly” disclosed are either mistaken, do not acknowledge the information and documents identified as publicly posted, do not take into consideration the nature of the requests and the existence (or lack thereof) of responsive documents, and/or do not consider the balancing required between the public benefit and the potential harm of requested disclosures.
| "With respect to the research summary that you provided in your DIDP Request and that you presented at the Non Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) Session, held on 8 March 2016 at [[ICANN55]] (referenced in your Request), while it is not within the parameters of a DIDP request or response for ICANN to review your research “for accuracy” as you request in your presentation, ICANN does note several discrepancies with the information and/or characterizations provided in your summary. In several instances, your characterizations of 'no' or 'partly' disclosed are either mistaken, do not acknowledge the information and documents identified as publicly posted, do not take into consideration the nature of the requests and the existence (or lack thereof) of responsive documents, and/or do not consider the balancing required between the public benefit and the potential harm of requested disclosures."
|-
|-
| 26 April 2016
| 26 April 2016
| Dot Registry LLC
| Dot Registry LLC
| Request for board meeting attendance, minutes, and preparatory materials for the meetings in August and September 2016; and other documents related to the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] review [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20160922-1-shaul-jolles-obo-dot-registry-llc-request-22sep16-en.pdf Full request].
| Request for board meeting attendance, minutes, and preparatory materials for the meetings in August and September 2016; and other documents related to the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] review [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20160922-1-shaul-jolles-obo-dot-registry-llc-request-22sep16-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20160922-1-shaul-jolles-obo-dot-registry-llc-response-21oct16-en.pdf Responded] that all documentation regarding the meetings, as well as the CPE Review, were publicly available. Did not produce additional documents.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20160922-1-shaul-jolles-obo-dot-registry-llc-response-21oct16-en.pdf Responded] that all documentation regarding the meetings, as well as the CPE Review, were publicly available. Declined to produce additional documents.
| 2, 8, & 9
| 2, 8, & 9
|
|
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Documentation of ICANN's compliance with lobbying laws
| Documentation of ICANN's compliance with lobbying laws
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-1-cis-response-23nov16-en.pdf Pointed to public records] of ICANN's lobbying activities
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-1-cis-response-23nov16-en.pdf Pointed to public records] of ICANN's lobbying activities; declined to produce other documents.
| No
| No
|
|
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Details of FY 2015 costs associated with the [[IANA Transition]]. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-2-cis-request-24oct16-en.pdf Full request].
| Details of FY 2015 costs associated with the [[IANA Transition]]. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-2-cis-request-24oct16-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-2-cis-response-23nov16-en.pdf Provided partial information]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-2-cis-response-23nov16-en.pdf Answered questions] but did not produce documents
| 2, 5, 6, & 8
| 2, 5, 6, & 8
| Response cited the process exemption that ICANN was not required to "create or compile" documents
| Response cited the process exemption that ICANN was not required to "create or compile" documents
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Correspondence between ICANN and (1) the World Economic Forum and (2) CGI.Br related to [[NETMundial]] and the NETMundial Initiative
| Correspondence between ICANN and (1) the World Economic Forum and (2) CGI.Br related to [[NETMundial]] and the NETMundial Initiative
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-6-cis-response-23nov16-en.pdf Pointed] to external resources.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-6-cis-response-23nov16-en.pdf Pointed] to external resources, declined to produce new documents
| 12 (implied)
| 12 (implied)
| "As noted in response to DIDP Request No. 20141228-1-NETmundial, ICANN is one of just many participants in the Internet governance realm, and ICANN is not the home for implementation of the NETmundial Principles or the evolution of multistakeholder participation in Internet governance...To the extent that this Request is seeking communications between representatives of WEF or CGI.Br and ICANN relating to the NETmundial Initiative this request is quite broad and seeks information that is not easily identified, and is ultimately of a low value to produce."
| "As noted in response to DIDP Request No. 20141228-1-NETmundial, ICANN is one of just many participants in the Internet governance realm, and ICANN is not the home for implementation of the NETmundial Principles or the evolution of multistakeholder participation in Internet governance...To the extent that this Request is seeking communications between representatives of WEF or CGI.Br and ICANN relating to the NETmundial Initiative this request is quite broad and seeks information that is not easily identified, and is ultimately of a low value to produce."
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Centre for Internet and Society
| Correspondence between the [[Namibian Network Information Centre]] (NNIC) and ICANN; agreements between those enitities that "give administrative control" of [[.na]] to NNIC; and "outputs and presenations to the board" by the ccNSO Technology working group during the tenure of Dr. [[Eberhard Lisse]] as chair of that group. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-7-cis-request-24oct16-en.pdf Full request].
| Correspondence between the [[Namibian Network Information Centre]] (NNIC) and ICANN; agreements between those enitities that "give administrative control" of [[.na]] to NNIC; and "outputs and presenations to the board" by the ccNSO Technology working group during the tenure of Dr. [[Eberhard Lisse]] as chair of that group. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-7-cis-request-24oct16-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-7-cis-response-23nov16-en.pdf Declined to respond] to first item beyond already-published correspondence.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20161024-7-cis-response-23nov16-en.pdf Declined to respond] to first item beyond already-published correspondence. ICANN was not in existence when .na was delegated, and was not in possession of anything responsive to the second item. There were also no documents responsive to the third item (presentations of the ccNSO technology working group)
| 10
| 10
| ICANN was not in existence when .na was delegated, and was not in possession of anything responsive to the second item. There were also no documents responsive to the third item (presentations of the ccNSO technology working group)
|
|-
|-
| 24 October 2016
| 24 October 2016