27,652
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 40:
Line 40: − +
→ICANN's Reasons for Policy Change on Vertical Separation
The ICANN Board enumerated ten reasons to support its policy change on vertical separation:<ref>
The ICANN Board enumerated ten reasons to support its policy change on vertical separation:<ref>
[http://archive.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/gac-board-registry-registrar-separation-21feb11-en.pdf ICANN Board-GAC Consultation:Registry-Registrar Separation, February 21, 2011]</ref>
[http://archive.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/gac-board-registry-registrar-separation-21feb11-en.pdf ICANN Board-GAC Consultation:Registry-Registrar Separation, February 21, 2011]</ref>
# None of the proposals submitted by the GNSO reflects a consensus opinion; as a result, the Board supported a model based on its own factual investigation, expert analysis, and concerns expressed by stakeholders and community.
# None of the proposals submitted by the GNSO reflected a consensus opinion; as a result, the Board supported a model based on its own factual investigation, expert analysis, and concerns expressed by stakeholders and community.
# ICANN's position and mission must be focused on creating more competition as opposed to having rules that restrict competition and innovation.
# ICANN's position and mission must be focused on creating more competition as opposed to having rules that restrict competition and innovation.
# Rules permitting cross-ownership foster greater diversity in business models and enhance opportunities offered by new TLDs.
# Rules permitting cross-ownership foster greater diversity in business models and enhance opportunities offered by new TLDs.