Changes

The original Registry Agreement, which lasted from 1999-2001, between ICANN and [[Network Solutions]] (and later [[Verisign]]) contained provisions for registry data escrow for the [[.com]], [[.net]], and [[.org]] [[gTLD]]s. In May 2001, ICANN entered into a new Registry Agreement with Verisign for .com, which included expanded escrow provisions. At that time they also entered into separate agreements for [[.org]] and [[.net]].

The original Registry Agreement, which lasted from 1999-2001, between ICANN and [[Network Solutions]] (and later [[Verisign]]) contained provisions for registry data escrow for the [[.com]], [[.net]], and [[.org]] [[gTLD]]s. In May 2001, ICANN entered into a new Registry Agreement with Verisign for .com, which included expanded escrow provisions. At that time they also entered into separate agreements for [[.org]] and [[.net]].

In November 2000, ICANN selected seven new gTLDs as part of a proof-of-concept round to expand the Internet name space. Registry Agreements for all 7 of these TLDs contained language based on the draft for the 2001 .com agreement with Verisign. These agreements were entered into between 2001 and 2002, beginning with [[.biz]] and [[.info]] in May 2001.  

In November 2000, ICANN selected seven new gTLDs as part of a proof-of-concept round to expand the Internet name space. Registry Agreements for all 7 of these TLDs contained language based on the draft for the 2001 .com agreement with Verisign. These agreements were entered into between 2001 and 2002, beginning with [[.biz]] and [[.info]] in May 2001.

 

There are currently 4 active versions of the Registry Escrow Agreement. Most gTLDs use Version 1, which is based off of the 2001 .com agreement; Version 2 is used by [[.travel]]; Version 3 by the [[.aero]], [[.coop]], and [[.museum]] [[sTLD|Sponsored TLDs]]; and Version 4 by [[.name]] and [[.pro]].

Several of the original [[ccTLD]] Sponsorship Agreements and [[MoU]]s also contained provisions for registry escrow. In 2004, however, ICANN moved away from the Sponsorship Agreement and MOU formats, opting for a lightweight Accountability Format, which does not contain detailed provisions for registry escrow, though it does encourage ccTLD managers to operate in a manner complaint to current [[IETF]] standards.<ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/tlds/data-escrow-report05mar07.htm#Historical ICANN's gTLD Registry Data Escrow Requirements, icann.org]</ref>

Several of the original [[ccTLD]] Sponsorship Agreements and [[MoU]]s also contained provisions for registry escrow. In 2004, however, ICANN moved away from the Sponsorship Agreement and MOU formats, opting for a lightweight Accountability Format, which does not contain detailed provisions for registry escrow, though it does encourage ccTLD managers to operate in a manner complaint to current [[IETF]] standards.<ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/tlds/data-escrow-report05mar07.htm#Historical ICANN's gTLD Registry Data Escrow Requirements, icann.org]</ref>