On April 1, 2010, NCUC also commented regarding the [[URS|Uniform Rapid Suspension]] (URS) System and the Trademark Clearing House Proposals that were revised by ICANN Staff. The Constituency cited that both documents represent the main deliberations and conclusions of GNSO's [[STI|Special Trademark Issues Team]], however, the Constituency found that some specific issues doesn't substantially coincide with the GNSO-STI recommendations. It also noticed that although ICANN Staff tried to consolidate the opinions of the Internet community regarding the issues but they believed that staff comments were added to the policy and pointed that it is arbitrary, unjustifiable and illegal.<ref>[http://ncdnhc.org/profiles/blogs/ncuc-comments-on-the-uniform NCUC Comments on Uniform Rapid Suspension System and Trademark Clearing House Proposals]</ref> | On April 1, 2010, NCUC also commented regarding the [[URS|Uniform Rapid Suspension]] (URS) System and the Trademark Clearing House Proposals that were revised by ICANN Staff. The Constituency cited that both documents represent the main deliberations and conclusions of GNSO's [[STI|Special Trademark Issues Team]], however, the Constituency found that some specific issues doesn't substantially coincide with the GNSO-STI recommendations. It also noticed that although ICANN Staff tried to consolidate the opinions of the Internet community regarding the issues but they believed that staff comments were added to the policy and pointed that it is arbitrary, unjustifiable and illegal.<ref>[http://ncdnhc.org/profiles/blogs/ncuc-comments-on-the-uniform NCUC Comments on Uniform Rapid Suspension System and Trademark Clearing House Proposals]</ref> |